Bill Stewart writes:
> I have removed the package. (The phrase "no good deed goes unpunished"
> comes to mind.)
I don't think anybody assumed any bad intentions on your part and it
just was to make you aware of the licensing problem and ask you to fix
it. The GPL's stated purpose istp protect the
Greetings, Bill Stewart!
>> No, you must backport all sources to the current and all previous versions
>> and
>> redistribute, or at least make them visible and available on your site,
>> otherwise you are in breach of the licence and must withdraw all
>> distributions
>>
> I have removed the pac
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 3:31 PM Brian Inglis wrote:
>
> No, you must backport all sources to the current and all previous versions
> > and
> > redistribute, or at least make them visible and available on your site,
> > otherwise you are in breach of the licence and must withdraw all
> > distribu
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 3:31 PM Brian Inglis wrote:
No, you must backport all sources to the current and all previous versions
> and
> redistribute, or at least make them visible and available on your site,
> otherwise you are in breach of the licence and must withdraw all
> distributions
>
I hav
On 2020-02-27 12:36, Bill Stewart wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:52 AM Achim Gratz wrote:
> But more to the point: since you include GPL components, a binary-only
>> distribution is not OK. The sources for at least the GPL licensed
>> utilities and libraries is missing. It's not enough to sa
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:52 AM Achim Gratz wrote:
But more to the point: since you include GPL components, a binary-only
> distribution is not OK. The sources for at least the GPL licensed
> utilities and libraries is missing. It's not enough to say what these
> are and roughly where to get th
Bill Stewart writes:
> The relevant licenses are provided as links in the installer and referenced
> in the User's Guide.
They are incomplete as they do not include the libraries you depend on.
But more to the point: since you include GPL components, a binary-only
distribution is not OK. The sou
Bill Stewart writes:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:47 PM ASSI wrote:
>
> You will perhaps want to read the Cygwin licensing terms
>> plus the licensing terms of each of the packages you distribute.
>>
>
> The relevant licenses are provided as links in the installer and referenced
> in the User's Gu
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:47 PM ASSI wrote:
You will perhaps want to read the Cygwin licensing terms
> plus the licensing terms of each of the packages you distribute.
>
The relevant licenses are provided as links in the installer and referenced
in the User's Guide.
Bill
--
Problem reports:
Bill Stewart writes:
> Installer is available on the 'Releases' tab.
You will perhaps want to read the Cygwin licensing terms
plus the licensing terms of each of the packages you distribute.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
SD adaptations
I have updated the package:
https://github.com/Bill-Stewart/Cygwin-OpenSSH
Installer is available on the 'Releases' tab.
Description:
Cygwin-OpenSSH is a convenient packaging of the Cygwin version of OpenSSH
for Windows systems.
Notable changes:
- Updated OpenSSH to version 8.2
- Updated cyg
11 matches
Mail list logo
