Re: [1.7.1] ssh key auth (pubkey) problem

2010-02-10 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 02/10/2010 09:08 PM, Julius Davies wrote: I've read the mailing lists and I know you guys don't think this is a bug, but I wish you'd reconsider. If you're going to reference something in your posting, it makes sense to actually provide a pointer to the threads you're referring to. This

Re: [1.7.1] ssh key auth (pubkey) problem

2010-02-10 Thread Julius Davies
>> >> I've read the mailing lists and I know you guys don't think this is a >> bug, but I wish you'd reconsider. > > If you're going to reference something in your posting, it makes sense > to actually provide a pointer to the threads you're referring to. > This was the most useful thread (closest

Re: [1.7.1] ssh key auth (pubkey) problem

2010-02-10 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 02/10/2010 05:53 PM, Julius Davies wrote: I've read the mailing lists and I know you guys don't think this is a bug, but I wish you'd reconsider. If you're going to reference something in your posting, it makes sense to actually provide a pointer to the threads you're referring to. As for y

[1.7.1] ssh key auth (pubkey) problem

2010-02-10 Thread Julius Davies
Hi, I've read the mailing lists and I know you guys don't think this is a bug, but I wish you'd reconsider. I don't really care that "we did things incorrectly in Cygwin 1.5 and it worked when it shouldn't have" because: 1. I don't want my little SCP accounts to be local Administrators! This i