Re: [1.7] no Fortran

2009-01-04 Thread Tim Prince
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 01:30:31PM -0800, Tim Prince wrote: So fortran has been added since the last time the mirrors were accessible (about Thursday)? Checking the release-2 directory on sourceware: % ls -l gcc4-fortran total 9648 -rw-rw-r-- 1 cyguser

Re: [1.7] no Fortran

2009-01-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 01:30:31PM -0800, Tim Prince wrote: > So fortran has been added since the last time the mirrors were accessible > (about Thursday)? Checking the release-2 directory on sourceware: % ls -l gcc4-fortran total 9648 -rw-rw-r-- 1 cyguser cygwin 4903942 Sep 10 01:59 gcc4

Re: [1.7] no Fortran

2009-01-04 Thread Tim Prince
Dave Korn wrote: Tim Prince wrote: I assumed, perhaps wrongly, there was no intention to provide Fortran in setup.exe. ??? dkad...@ubik ~ $ cygcheck -c cygwin gcc4-fortran Cygwin Package Information Package VersionStatus cygwin 1.7.0-35 OK gc

Re: [1.7] no Fortran

2009-01-04 Thread Dave Korn
Tim Prince wrote: > I assumed, perhaps wrongly, there was no intention to provide Fortran in > setup.exe. ??? dkad...@ubik ~ $ cygcheck -c cygwin gcc4-fortran Cygwin Package Information Package VersionStatus cygwin 1.7.0-35 OK gcc4-fortran 4.3.2-

[1.7] no Fortran

2009-01-03 Thread Tim Prince
I assumed, perhaps wrongly, there was no intention to provide Fortran in setup.exe. I noticed under gcc-4 -v that --enable-languages includes a bogus selection of f77, which raises doubt about whether omission of fortran is intentional. I have built several snapshots of gcc 4.4 with fortran selec