Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:41:19AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> The code handling heap_chunk_in_mb hasn't changed at all since 1.5.25,
>> except for the registry location where it's loaded from. I'm wondering
>> if the mere size of the heap chunk is enough here to
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:41:19AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>The code handling heap_chunk_in_mb hasn't changed at all since 1.5.25,
>except for the registry location where it's loaded from. I'm wondering
>if the mere size of the heap chunk is enough here to disturb
>functionality which requi
On Mar 15 22:53, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> Apologies for what is going to be quite light on details as bug reports go,
> but I've only just noticed it and I haven't got a simple testcase yet.
>
> As the subject line says, heap_chunk_in_mb=1536 breaks expect. The
> situation that I'm seeing this i
Apologies for what is going to be quite light on details as bug reports go,
but I've only just noticed it and I haven't got a simple testcase yet.
As the subject line says, heap_chunk_in_mb=1536 breaks expect. The
situation that I'm seeing this in is when attempting to run the binutils
tests
4 matches
Mail list logo
