Chris Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 03:13:47AM +, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
Ah another day another tclsh.
Ah, another hour, another tcl/tk whinge.
:-).
Even if it's only a soft link to the most recently installed tclshNN
(like RPM post-install scripts do for the linux kernel etc.)
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 03:13:47AM +, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>Ah another day another tclsh.
Ah, another hour, another tcl/tk whinge.
>Even if it's only a soft link to the most recently installed tclshNN
>(like RPM post-install scripts do for the linux kernel etc.). I know
>cygwin has got po
Ah another day another tclsh.
Unfortunately there are those of us who like having scripts that are
portable between OS's :-). On Linux at least, tclsh is installed as
/usr/bin/tclsh with no version number suffix. Cygwin used tclsh83 and
tclsh84 and will no doubt use tclsh85 when it comes out.
3 matches
Mail list logo