Re: /proc/cpuinfo vs. processor groups

2018-04-11 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen writes: >> I'm a bit puzzled about the connection between MaximumProcessorCount >> and ActiveProcessorCount here. Why isn't MaximumProcessorCount 16 >> as well? Setting it to 64 doesn't make any sense for a system with >> 32 logical CPUs in total. The way I understand it is that

Re: /proc/cpuinfo vs. processor groups

2018-04-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 11 11:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 11 09:02, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Apr 10 18:36, Achim Gratz wrote: > > > As briefly discussed on IRC I've got a new Server 2016 blade with 2 > > > sockets × 8 cores × 2 HT =32 logical processors and Cygwin spews errors > > > for processor ID

Re: /proc/cpuinfo vs. processor groups

2018-04-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 11 09:02, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > THanks for the report but this belongs to the cygwin ML. > I'm redirecting this here. > > > Corinna > > On Apr 10 18:36, Achim Gratz wrote: > > > > As briefly discussed on IRC I've got a new Server 2016 blade with 2 > > sockets × 8 cores × 2 HT =32 log

Re: /proc/cpuinfo vs. processor groups

2018-04-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
THanks for the report but this belongs to the cygwin ML. I'm redirecting this here. Corinna On Apr 10 18:36, Achim Gratz wrote: > > As briefly discussed on IRC I've got a new Server 2016 blade with 2 > sockets × 8 cores × 2 HT =32 logical processors and Cygwin spews errors > for processor ID 16