RE: source command broken in bash

2002-11-26 Thread Bryan Higgins
Found it--there was a file "x" in /usr/bin. The "which" command didn't find it, for some reason. Thanks for checking. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ:

RE: source command broken in bash

2002-11-26 Thread Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
At 05:34 PM 11/26/2002, Bryan Higgins wrote: >It turns out I was trying to source a file named x, and x appears to be spe- >cial in Cygwin. If I type x (after deleting my file x), I get the gawk usage. >There are no aliases to x, and "whence x" yields nothing. If I then exit the >shell will ^D, I

RE: source command broken in bash

2002-11-26 Thread Bryan Higgins
It turns out I was trying to source a file named x, and x appears to be spe- cial in Cygwin. If I type x (after deleting my file x), I get the gawk usage. There are no aliases to x, and "whence x" yields nothing. If I then exit the shell will ^D, I get a bunch of other crap. If you could confirm

RE: source command broken in bash

2002-11-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ymbolic or otherwise) that would do the same thing as the aliases. Better check your system for those too. Larry Original Message: - From: Bryan Higgins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:37:34 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: "source" command broken in ba

"source" command broken in bash

2002-11-26 Thread Bryan Higgins
Neither "source" nor "." work for me in bash--it displays the gawk usage message! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/