Re: 'more' segment faults with latest cygwin1.dll (1.7.11)

2012-02-29 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 28 19:36, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 11:24 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Feb 28 03:43, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > > > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:18 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > It's a bug in more, afaics. In case of pressing 'n', the search > > > > fun

Re: 'more' segment faults with latest cygwin1.dll (1.7.11)

2012-02-28 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 11:24 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 28 03:43, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:18 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > It's a bug in more, afaics. In case of pressing 'n', the search function > > > is called with a NULL buf argument. However, t

Re: 'more' segment faults with latest cygwin1.dll (1.7.11)

2012-02-28 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 28 03:43, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:18 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > It's a bug in more, afaics. In case of pressing 'n', the search function > > is called with a NULL buf argument. However, the function calls > > strlen(buf) without checking buf for NULL. T

Re: 'more' segment faults with latest cygwin1.dll (1.7.11)

2012-02-28 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:18 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > It's a bug in more, afaics. In case of pressing 'n', the search function > is called with a NULL buf argument. However, the function calls > strlen(buf) without checking buf for NULL. The indentation at this > point in the file looks l

Re: 'more' segment faults with latest cygwin1.dll (1.7.11)

2012-02-28 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 27 17:22, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 20:59 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > I can reproduce it as well, but the crash occurs in the application, > > not in Cygwin. Yaakov, this is from the util-linux package, can you > > please have a look what happens there? > > Ye

Re: 'more' segment faults with latest cygwin1.dll (1.7.11)

2012-02-27 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 20:59 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I can reproduce it as well, but the crash occurs in the application, > not in Cygwin. Yaakov, this is from the util-linux package, can you > please have a look what happens there? Yes, it's already on my todo list. Yaakov -- Proble

Re: 'more' segment faults with latest cygwin1.dll (1.7.11)

2012-02-27 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 27 10:14, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > 'more' is segment faulting with the latest Cygwin .DLL (1.7.11). I > can reproduce this problem on both a Windows 7 64-bit machine and a > Windows XP 32-bit machine. > > I've attached the stackdump and cygcheck output. > > Here's how to reproduce the pr

Re: 'more' segment faults with latest cygwin1.dll (1.7.11)

2012-02-27 Thread Roger K. Wells
On 02/27/2012 12:14 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: 'more' is segment faulting with the latest Cygwin .DLL (1.7.11). I can reproduce this problem on both a Windows 7 64-bit machine and a Windows XP 32-bit machine. I've attached the stackdump and cygcheck output. Here's how to reproduce the problem