Re: [OT] PCYMTNQREAIYR

2007-05-13 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
Markus E.L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Markus Schönhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: By hell. My apologies. And with deep regret. etc. I'll really have to have a look, why that sometimes works and sometimes not (my address mangling). U

Re: Speed of Cygwin's cp vs. Windows Explorer

2007-05-13 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > According to Bob Heckel on 5/12/2007 7:23 AM: >> Why would using Cygwin's cp to copy a large file from one Windows XP >> box to another take 30 minutes but take only 10 minutes if I use drag >> 'n' drop (via Explorer)? > > It has been mentioned in the past

Re: MD5s of setup.exe on mirrors.

2007-05-13 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
Brian Dessent writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Please anyone touch setup.exe? If the mirrors pick it up then we (you! >> :) know that it is, somehow, a time stamping issue. The issue can >> probably not be cleared up right now and is probably not worth the >> trouble, but perhaps it can be

Re: Trademark rights and copyright for "Cygwin" and logo.

2007-05-12 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > AFAICT, I'm being consistent. Thank *you* for not sending another > multi-page diatribe in response to statements of facts. After first starting the attack you can't keep peace? You got my answer by personal mail. If it satisfies you: I'm alread

Re: MD5s of setup.exe on mirrors.

2007-05-12 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
"Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 12 May 2007 09:54, ls-cygwin-2006 wrote: > >>>> b31ddcef84f25919a5d3184167b4a90d setup.exe >>>> >>>> whereas the setup.exe has actually the md5sum: >>>> >>>>

Re: Trademark rights and copyright for "Cygwin" and logo.

2007-05-12 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:52:33PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >>Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:56:21PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote: For the Cygwin folks, it is really a good idea to have the preferred

Re: MD5s of setup.exe on mirrors.

2007-05-12 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
Alexander Sotirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Cygwin mirrors have in their toplevel a setup.exe and an md5.sum. The >> m5sum is >> >> ae1944f528338033bab3b4710d5bd736 setup.bz2 >> b31ddcef84f25919a5d3184167b4a90d setup.exe >> 0503889504b7ff0b23e65586a522b3ad

Re: MD5s of setup.exe on mirrors.

2007-05-11 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:58:59PM -0700, Alexander Sotirov wrote: >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Cygwin mirrors have in their toplevel a setup.exe and an md5.sum. The >>> m5sum is >>> >>> ae1944f528338033bab3b4710d5bd736 setup.bz2 >>> b31ddcef84f25919a5d3184167b4a90d setup.exe >>> 0503

Re: Trademark rights and copyright for "Cygwin" and logo.

2007-05-11 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
o get things clear etc, so no need for further hint on the, legally speaking, unreliability of such war stories.) "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 11 May 2007 19:34, ls-cygwin-2006 wrote: > >> "Dave Korn" writes: >> >>> On 11

MD5s of setup.exe on mirrors.

2007-05-11 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
Some hours ago I noticed something strange: Cygwin mirrors have in their toplevel a setup.exe and an md5.sum. The m5sum is ae1944f528338033bab3b4710d5bd736 setup.bz2 b31ddcef84f25919a5d3184167b4a90d setup.exe 0503889504b7ff0b23e65586a522b3ad setup.ini whereas the setup.exe has actual

Re: Trademark rights and copyright for "Cygwin" and logo.

2007-05-11 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
"Dave Korn" writes: > On 11 May 2007 18:25, ls-cygwin-2006 wrote: > > [snip] > > You need to get it in writing, from Redhat's legal dept. Fine. Even links to the Cygwin FAQ (if it had such a section touching on the topic)? I'm a tad surprised. > Noth

Re: Trademark rights and copyright for "Cygwin" and logo.

2007-05-11 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
Dear Christopher Faylor, > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:13:12AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>Nonetheless I continue to be thankful for anybody's input (esp. if I >>just missed a plainly visible and well known document on that topic >>somewhere). > > It is unclear to me what kind of insight y

Re: Trademark rights and copyright for "Cygwin" and logo.

2007-05-10 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> If I understand it right, Cygwin is trademark of redhat and the Cygwin >> logo is copyright protected. > > > > > > You should probably take this discussion to cygwin-licensing list. Ooops, yes thanks

Trademark rights and copyright for "Cygwin" and logo.

2007-05-10 Thread ls-cygwin-2006
Hi All, If I understand it right, Cygwin is trademark of redhat and the Cygwin logo is copyright protected. Some people I know (including me) like to have their software on CD for archiving (to get repeatable results or be able to understand errors in former setups), so I've written a small tool