Re: Cygwin Memory Allocation and heap_chunk_in_mb

2004-07-01 Thread Dan Hatton
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Brian Ford wrote: > That's only half of it. You need to set the > IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE flag in the executable's COFF header. Let me check I've got clear what to do: I need to download the source code for the cygwin ld package apply the patch of 6th May, 2

Re: Cygwin Memory Allocation and heap_chunk_in_mb

2004-06-30 Thread Dan Hatton
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Tim Prince wrote: > cygwin doesn't emulate a 64-bit OS. Did you try setting up XP with /3GB to > see whether that would give another 1 GB, or check the archives for any > reports on such an attempt? I've now added " /3GB" to the end of the last line of my boot.ini, making th

Cygwin Memory Allocation and heap_chunk_in_mb

2004-06-30 Thread Dan Hatton
ing.) Anyone got any ideas what's happening, please? -- Thanks Dan Hatton Daniel C. Hatton BA, MSci, MA, AMInstP, AILTHE Research Fellow E-Mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> World-Wide Web: <http://www.bib.hatton.btinternet.co.uk/dan/> Telephon

Re: Setup 2.358 Hangs During Post-Install Script

2003-09-09 Thread Dan Hatton
Having originally found this problem with Setup 2.358 under Windows 2000, I've now reproduced it with Setup 2.364 under Windows XP, and on a total of 3 independent machines. And it's still happening as of last night. On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Dan Hatton wrote: > I've been trying t

Setup 2.358 Hangs During Post-Install Script

2003-08-22 Thread Dan Hatton
ch is a symlink to /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86-bin-icons.sh. After cancelling setup, I can still run Cygwin and XFree86 (phew.) Any ideas, please? -- Ta Dan Hatton <http://www.bib.hatton.btinternet.co.uk/dan/> -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports:

Memleak Apparently Attributable to Cygwin Setup

2003-06-19 Thread Dan Hatton
Upgrading to Setup 2.358 didn't solve the problem, although it did speed up the process of changing from "All:Default" to "All:Install"Â in the package selection screen. Once again, after 2 hours, Setup was still on a2ps, and total memory usage had reached ~2GB, although setup-2.358.exe was only a

Memleak Apparently Attributable to Cygwin Setup

2003-06-17 Thread dan . hatton
I've tried the "extreme patience" suggestion. After 2 hours of installing, Setup was still on a2ps, and total memory usage had reached ~2GB, although setup.exe was only admitting to being responsible for ~14MB of it. I think we can conclude that this hasn't worked. Next, I'll give the "latest

Re: Memleak Apparently Attributable to Cygwin Setup

2003-06-16 Thread Dan Hatton
Oops. I should have mentioned: I'm using Cygwin Setup 2.340.2.5, under Windows 2000. -- Dan Hatton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.htm

Memleak Apparently Attributable to Cygwin Setup

2003-06-16 Thread Dan Hatton
emory use, as previously noted [S. Reddie. Memory leak? (was: 1.3.9: "fork: Permission denied" (Windows 2000.)) [EMAIL PROTECTED], Feb. 2002.], in a rather different context, on this mailing list. Any ideas, please, anyone? -- Thanks Dan Hatton <http://www.bib.hatton.btinternet.co.uk/da