Re: checking in >= 256k file fatally corrupts rcs file

2014-02-26 Thread Wagemans, Peter
This is an additional comment on the thread starting with http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-10/msg00086.html Recently I was bitten again by this RCS 5.8 bug after I failed to keep RCS at version 5.7 during a Cygwin update. The failure mechanism is described in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwi

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: rcs-5.8.1-1: The Revision Control System

2012-09-26 Thread Wagemans, Peter
Dear Dr. Zell, > [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: rcs-5.8.1-1: The Revision Control System Do you perhaps know whether this version fixes the file corruption problem noticed earlier on this list for 5.8, or should we stay with 5.7 to avoid corrupting large RCS files? Short problem description (what I th

RE: RCS file corruption.

2012-06-21 Thread Wagemans, Peter
Brian Wilson wrote: > From what I've read in this discussion, I think the issue is that > the '^M' characters may not be seen by RCS as an EOL. The problem occurs in a loop that copies one character at a time to move the entire content of the work file into the new RCS file as the latest version

RE: RCS file corruption.

2012-06-21 Thread Wagemans, Peter
Richard Gribble wrote: > I have experienced this problem several times. In my case it seemed > to be a problem between 'Unix' and 'DOS' files. In each case, I > have been able to fix it by editing the RCS file using vim and > deleting all the extraneous carriage returns RCS should be able to h