Hello.
Is there a historical list of installation file hashes?
As in a file that offers the contents of this file:
https://cygwin.com/sha512.sum
per version?
Sophoklis
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 11:19, Sophoklis Goumas
wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Is there a historical list of installation file hashes?
>
> As in a file that offers the contents of this file:
> https://cygwin.com/sha512.sum
> per version?
>
Nevermind.
I've found this:
htt
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 12:35, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote:
>
> Your conclusion about there being some extra prefix is premature.
>
Indeed it is, please excuse me.
> That's just the number of the history entry, padded up to 5 characters
> with spaces for better alignment (as in
>
> printf("%
This comes from a cygwin installation:
~$ cygcheck -V | head -n1
cygcheck (cygwin) 3.5.3
~$ printf "%s\n" "$( bash --version | head -n1 )"
GNU bash, version 5.2.21(1)-release (x86_64-pc-cygwin)
~$ history | tail -n1 | od -a
000 sp sp sp 4 3 sp sp h i s t o r y sp |
00
Hello.
I'm seeing some contradicting clues from cygwin.com and
fruitbat.org's Cygwin Time Machine [1] as to which
is the latest version of "setup-x86(_64)?\.exe" with WinXP "support".
Something like:
> The previous Cygwin version 2.5.2 was the last version supporting Windows XP
> and Server 200
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:23 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
> the two reports are separated
>
> http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=cygutils-extra&arch=x86_64
>
I know and hence this discussion.
But should omitting the arch criteria, tha being the '&arch=x86_64'
part of the the URI return
Hello everyone, and a special hello to this mailing list's regulars!
Shouldn't the following:
http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=cygutils-extra
return results for both x86 and x86_64 architectures?
Sophoklis
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
7 matches
Mail list logo
