Hi Jeff.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 11:32:59AM -0400, Jeffrey C Honig allegedly wrote:
> I use emacs under Cygwin (with Cygwin/XFree86 and/or Exceed) and would
> like to switch to using mh-e in this environment.
The last I heard getting nmh working wasn't easy. Have you done it?
> One thing that I wo
OK, thanks.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 12:39:00PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski allegedly wrote:
> Note that neither the question nor the answer have anything to do with
> Cygwin.
What do you think he should have done? He didn't know where the
solution might be for the cygwin environment. The only change I think
would
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 08:13:19AM -0400, Neal D. Becker allegedly wrote:
> I've got xemacs-21.4.12 running fine on the latest cygwin. Now I only have
> one problem. I normally run linux/kde, and have the caps lock and ctrl key
> swapped (so ctrl is where it's supposed to be). You need ctrl for e
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 02:13:05PM -0700, Randall R Schulz allegedly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Reply-To: header (or, more precisely, control over it) belongs to
> the originator of the mail, not to the list server or its administrator.
>
> Randall Schulz
Reply-To is often added by list servers, but I v
How do I change the default beep (\C-g) for cygwin windows? I thought
this was in the archives but I can't find it. I believe this is a
Windows thing (registry?).
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation
Is http://www.mail-archive.com/nmh-workers@mhost.com/msg00618.html still
state of the art for making nmh build under cygwin? If not, pointers
please? It would be great if someone had a patch file all assembled.
Thanks ... Scott
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 12:38:25PM +1100, Robert Collins allegedly wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 12:33, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 04:24:53PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > >At 08:50 2003-01-04, John Morrison wrote:
> > >>Please find for you perusal and review... (long
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 02:42:57PM +, A. S. Budden allegedly wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'm a bit of a beginner with CygWin to be honest, I use it (at the moment) almost
>exclusively to get the benefit of the better compile of Mutt than the Win32 version.
>
> I have been using Mutt for a while a
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 03:23:46PM -0500, Harig, Mark A. allegedly wrote:
> If it is an option, you might consider
> running the Windows 'convert' utility
> to change your filesystem from FAT32
> to NTFS. Your operating system (Win2K)
> support NTFS, of course.
Thanks, but this is also the partition
My mistake, I wasn't using the patched version (/usr/bin versus
/usr/local/bin). The patch seems to work. Thanks.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 09:24:14PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet allegedly wrote:
> Mutt needs two fixes to run on FAT:
> - a fix to Cygwin, included since October.
> - a patch to mutt, see below.
> The mutt maintainer is aware of this patch. I hope it eventually
> will become part of the mutt distribution
Looking through the mail archives I can't tell what the recommended fix
is for running mutt/fetchmail/procmail and all on a FAT32 partition, wrt
file locking problems. There was plenty of discussion last summer but I
can't find a resolution. So far I've tried CYGWIN=nontsec, and
reconfiguring and
13 matches
Mail list logo
