Re: Win2k Command Window Can't Execute G++

2009-06-01 Thread Roger Head
Alexey Borzenkov gmail.com> writes: > As an alternative you can try looking into my > http://git.kitsu.ru/mine/shell-wrapper.git (use snapshot link for > topmost commit if you don't have git and don't know how to clone) > Thanks Alexey, I'll have a look. Roger -- Unsubscribe info: htt

Re: Win2k Command Window Can't Execute G++

2009-05-31 Thread Roger Head
Dave Korn googlemail.com> writes: > How about just typing "g++-4" (or "g++-3") instead of "g++" when trying to > invoke the compiler from a DOS shell? > > cheers, > DaveK > U... e no, no, that's too easy. There must be a harder way to do it. Thanks Dave. Roger --

Re: Win2k Command Window Can't Execute G++

2009-05-31 Thread Roger Head
Hi Andy, > > I'm almost certain that I was able to invoke it from a CMD window. > > Afaik, gcc and g++ changed into links only recently, to help with the > transition from gcc-3.4 to 4.3. > There are still some remnants of AVR-GCC hanging around on my system from a few years ago. Maybe a conne

Re: Win2k Command Window Can't Execute G++

2009-05-31 Thread Roger Head
Matt Wozniski gmail.com> writes: > > Don't have a cygwin install in front of me ATM, but - isn't g++ a > cygwin symlink these days? cmd.exe can't follow those even if they're > in the path, of course. > > ~Matt > Thanks for the reply, Matt. I don't have a really good idea of how Cygwin and

Re: Win2k Command Window Can't Execute G++

2009-05-30 Thread Roger Head
Larry Hall (Cygwin cygwin.com> writes: > > Roger Head wrote: > > Hi All, > > Cygwin installation I had to manually add \Cygwin\bin and \Cygwin\usr\bin to the PATH. That hasn't been altered. > If you want Windows applications to be able to see Cygwin apps witho

Win2k Command Window Can't Execute G++

2009-05-30 Thread Roger Head
Hi All, I'm a noob to Cygwin and all things non-Windows. I installed Cygwin on my Win2k system (a couple of hiccups, but nothing major), then installed the GCC. When that completed, I did g++ -v in a bash window, and got the expected response. I am *sure* (99% anyway) that I was also able to do