Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] pl-0.10.2-1 - the Parma Polyhedra Library

tests fail when built without this option. Dear David, concerning the need to link with "LDFLAGS=-Wl,--enable-auto-import", I am wondering if there is something we could do upstream to simplify the life of Cygwin users. If so, please let me know. All the best, Roberto -- Pro

Re: [PPL-devel] Cygwin 1.7: signal handler not invoked (regression from 1.5)

Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:00:33PM +0200, Roberto Bagnara wrote: the following shows a problem in Cygwin 1.7 that is not present in Cygwin 1.5: [snip] As you see, the alarm() function is not invoked as it should (and as it is in Cygwin 1.5). It was invoked ony by

Cygwin 1.7: signal handler not invoked (regression from 1.5)

All the best, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/

GCC 4.x for cygwin

Where can I find it? (From the installer it seems that the latest available version is 3.4.4, but this is really unusable for serious C++ development.) All the best, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http

Re: Precision of doubles and stdio

Jim Easton wrote: Dear Mr. Bagnara, Roberto Bagnara wrote: ... does this on Linux/i686 $ a.out 70.9 70.905684341886080801486968994140625 and does the following under Cygwin on the same machine: ... $ ./a.exe 70.9 70.90568434188608080148696899414 Why? Is there a

Re: May I suggest the study of...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Roberto Bagnara wrote: Tim Prince wrote: Roberto Bagnara wrote: Hi there, the following little program #include int main() { double d; scanf("%lf", &d); printf("%.1000g\n", d); return 0; } does this on Linux/i686 $ gcc -W

Re: Precision of doubles and stdio

skaller wrote: On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 12:44 +0100, Roberto Bagnara wrote: Tim Prince wrote: My past reading of various relevant documents convinced me that digits beyond the 17th in formatting of doubles are not required by any standard to be consistent between implementations. They have no

Re: Precision of doubles and stdio

Tim Prince wrote: Roberto Bagnara wrote: Hi there, the following little program #include int main() { double d; scanf("%lf", &d); printf("%.1000g\n", d); return 0; } does this on Linux/i686 $ gcc -W -Wall in.c $ a.out 70.9 70.90568434188608

Precision of doubles and stdio

anf immediately followed by a printf shows a difference between Cygwin and Linux. All the best, Roberto -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer Science Group Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy http://www.cs.unipr.it/~bagnara/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Unsubscribe info:

Why is not available in cygwin?

I am wondering why this header file and the corresponding C99 functionality appears to be missing from cygwin. Does anyone know? Cheers, Roberto P.S. I know fenv.h is available in mingw, but this does not help me as I cannot then link with libmingwex. -- Prof. Roberto Bagnara Computer