Re: make[4]: cl: Command not found

2012-02-07 Thread Quinn Wood
I discovered that while the code is designed for Unix like operating system, it was indeed making a call to cl. I apologize for not recognizing that I needed to look at the line in the file it mentioned explicitly as the fail point. I also apologize that these are not reading as follow-ups correct

Re: make[4]: cl: Command not found

2012-02-07 Thread Quinn Wood
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 21:36 -0600, Quinn Wood wrote: >> When attempting to compile an application I recieved this error. >> >> make[4]: cl: Command not found >> >> Recognizing the line I'm eithe

make[4]: cl: Command not found

2012-02-07 Thread Quinn Wood
When attempting to compile an application I recieved this error. make[4]: cl: Command not found Recognizing the line I'm either toeing or- more accurately- crossing the line between on- and offtopic here (I apologize) what is "cl?" I won't sully this mailing list by asking where to find it. Searc

Re: Package Search broken?

2012-02-07 Thread Quinn Wood
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: > Is the Package Search function broken? Each time I try a > search, for whatever, it tries to download > "package-grep.cgi". Happened in both IE and Firefox. > --Ken Nellis > Also confirrmed on Firefox 10.0. -- Problem reports: http://

Re: Documentation on -mno-cygwin Accuracy

2012-02-07 Thread Quinn Wood
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:42 AM, marco atzeri wrote: > On 2/7/2012 5:13 PM, carolus wrote: >> Is there an easy procedure that is equivalent >> to the old -mno-cygwin (suitable for a dumb engineer who is not a >> programmer and knows nothing about cross-compilation)? -mno-cygwin was a >> very handy

Re: Documentation on -mno-cygwin Accuracy

2012-02-06 Thread Quinn Wood
I apologize for the accidental use of your email address in the body of that message. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-

Re: Documentation on -mno-cygwin Accuracy

2012-02-06 Thread Quinn Wood
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > The -mno-cygwin flag is still handled by gcc3, but that is deprecated > and may be removed at any time.  The officially supported way to build > such apps is to use the appropriate mingw or mingw64 cross-compiler. > > > Yaakov Thank you fo

Documentation on -mno-cygwin Accuracy

2012-02-06 Thread Quinn Wood
On the FAQ section 6.10 "How do I compile a Win32 executable that doesn't use Cygwin?" reads: "(Please note: This section has not yet been updated for the latest net release.) "The -mno-cygwin flag to gcc makes gcc link against standard Microsoft DLLs instead of Cygwin. This is desirable for nati