Re: SableVM & Cygwin (was: Re: sablevm + windows)

2004-10-13 Thread Peter Lovell
Hi Gerrit, many thanks for this. Great ! Speaking only for myself, I believe that option (2) would be the appropriate one. It might be nice to include it also back to gcc but I suspect that sablevm developers might prefer to not have that dependency. I'll fetch your patches and test and let you

Re: sablevm + windows

2004-10-08 Thread Peter Lovell
Hi Gerrit, On Oct 8, 2004, at 8:59 AM, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Grzegorz wrote: On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 18:45, Peter Lovell wrote: I was not able to check out Mélanie's sandbox in the way you suggested ($ svn co svn+ssh://svn.sablevm.org/public/developers/mlord sablevm-mlord) probably because I

Re: sablevm + windows

2004-10-08 Thread Peter Lovell
Hi Grzegorz, On Oct 8, 2004, at 3:18 AM, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 18:45, Peter Lovell wrote: I was not able to check out Mélanie's sandbox in the way you suggested ($ svn co svn+ssh://svn.sablevm.org/public/developers/mlord sablevm-mlord) probably because I don'