Re: Fork issue with timerfd

2019-03-11 Thread Peter Kozich (UM)
On Sat, 2019-03-09 at 16:39 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 8 23:44, Peter Kozich (UM) wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 23:21 +0100, Peter Kozich (UM) wrote: > > > [...] > > > I tested this: > > > xxx

Re: Fork issue with timerfd

2019-03-08 Thread Peter Kozich (UM)
On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 23:21 +0100, Peter Kozich (UM) wrote: > I made a mistake, the correct snapshot I tested is this: > https://cygwin.com/snapshots/x86/cygwin1-20190306.dll.xz > > > On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 22:23 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Mar 6 21:54, Pe

Re: Fork issue with timerfd

2019-03-08 Thread Peter Kozich (UM)
I made a mistake, the correct snapshot I tested is this: https://cygwin.com/snapshots/x86/cygwin1-20190306.dll.xz On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 22:23 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 6 21:54, Peter Kozich (UM) wrote: > > In response to this one: > > > > Re: Fo

Re: Fork issue with timerfd

2019-03-08 Thread Peter Kozich (UM)
On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 22:23 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 6 21:54, Peter Kozich (UM) wrote: > > In response to this one: > > > > Re: Fork issue with timerfd > > > >From: Achim Gratz > >To: cygwin at cygwin dot com > >

Re: Fork issue with timerfd

2019-03-06 Thread Peter Kozich (UM)
In response to this one: Re: Fork issue with timerfd From: Achim Gratz To: cygwin at cygwin dot com Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:15:32 +0100 Subject: Re: Fork issue with timerfd Anyway, the latest snapshot seemingly resolved that issue as w