On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> > "fread() shall return the number of elements successfully read which is
> > less than nitems only if a read error or end-of-file is encountered."
> >
>
> Where in the POSIX standard did you find that above line? I could not locate
> it
> in mine. Th
Dave Korn wrote:
> The fix and the problem Peter is seeing are orthogonal.
>
> The fix referred to above fixes this problem:
>
>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/newlib/2004/msg00478.html
>"Hence, one can see that fread() in unbuffered mode always returns the
>specified count instead of the number o
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > >> I've discovered that fread(ptr, size, nitems, stream) sometimes returns a
> > >> value less than "nitems", but does not set feof() nor ferror(). As I
> >
> > >A simple, compilable test case with results shown on both linux and
> > >cygwin would p
>> I've discovered that fread(ptr, size, nitems, stream) sometimes returns a
>> value less than "nitems", but does not set feof() nor ferror(). As I
>A simple, compilable test case with results shown on both linux and
>cygwin would prove your theory.
Here you go; example follows. Test run on Lin
4 matches
Mail list logo
