wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Pedro Inacio"
I've initiated the post "select() too slow".
The example I've done was a non-blocking tcp echo_server.c and
how slow it was on linux compared with cygwin.
In fact after activation oh tcp_nodelay option the t
Hello,
I've initiated the post "select() too slow".
The example I've done was a non-blocking tcp echo_server.c and how
slow it was on linux compared with cygwin.
In fact after activation oh tcp_nodelay option the times were similar.
Meanwhile I've done another test, I've added ssl on top of t
Yes! I've confirmed that!
With TCP_NODELAY Cygwin and Linux times are similar.
It seems that there is some issue with the Naggle algorithm on
Windows for sure.
Thanks
Pedro Inacio
On 2006/03/15, at 21:49, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
It looks like this is a TCP_NODELAY issue. You te
On 2006/03/14, at 22:43, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:42:25PM +, Pedro Inacio wrote:
I don't have any 100MB files sitting around but when I tried this on a
14MB file, I find that cygwin is about 2X slower, not an order of
magnitude slower. Taking away the pip
detail more the process I'm doing.
Hope that helps to identify what the problem is.
Why it takes so much more time on Cygwin than on Linux?
On 2006/03/14, at 19:18, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 06:59:28PM +, Pedro Inacio wrote:
Hello again,
as promised attached you
on Cygwin?
There is any obvious wrong thing I'm doing?
It seems to be a select() problem.
Thanks in advance,
Pedro Inacio
echo_server.c
Description: Binary data
On 2006/03/11, at 18:16, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 06:04:37PM +0000, Pedro Inacio wrote:
On 2006/03/11,
On 2006/03/11, at 18:16, Christopher Faylor wrote:
But we don't know what the actual problem *is*. What does "too slow"
mean? select takes an extra twenty milliseconds under Cygwin?
select doesn't
respond within 24 hours?
You are right, I recognize that I haven't gave sufficient
detai
On 2006/03/11, at 15:40, Eric Blake wrote:
I'm afraid that this is not a very good bug report, as you have not
attempted to describe WHAT is too slow, and have not provided a simple
test case that compiles out of the box, with timing numbers on the
test
case compared between Linux and Cygwi
ning the latest version of Cygwin.
There is any known issue? There is some work for a fix?
Anyone can help?
Thanks in advance,
Pedro Inacio
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: ht
9 matches
Mail list logo
