By the way, when I try to build it says Automake 1.10a is required.
However, this version isn't
an option under cygwin, only 1.10.3, 1.10.2, etc. How do I fixed this, hack
configure.ac?
-Original Message-
From: neil.mowb...@calgacus.com [mailto:neil.mowb...@calgacus.com]
Sent: 03 January
Okay, so I get the general idea. First you get the cygwin-src package.
Unpack it and
run cygport on the coreutils-7.0-2.cygport file with download option. This
downloads
the original gnu package and applies the two patch files.
coreutils-7.0-2.src.patch and
coreutils-7.0-2.cygwin.patch. I assume
Folks,
Of course I can try to figure it out myself, but I wonder if anyone can give
me
a quick pointer on how to build core cygwin packages which only provide
patch
files over the orginal GNU source.
For eample coreutils-7.0-2-src.tar.bz contains:
coreutils-7.0-2.cygport
coreutils-7.0-2.cygport
Folks,
At least the following are missing from cygwin's
#define FILE_ATTRIBUTE_VIRTUAL 0x0001
(from MS WinNT.h)
#define SYMBOLIC_LINK_FLAG_DIRECTORY(0x1) (from MS WinBase.h)
Regards, Neil
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Thanks folks. I did have a /etc/postinstll/gcc.sh.done but it was
installing v3.0
so I modified to v4.0 and run it which solved the problem. Also apologies
for not understanding how alternatives works -- all fixed now.
Regards, Neil
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 12/30/2009 08:07 AM, neil.mowb
Folks,
A bit of a vague question but any greater clarity concerning the appropriate
level of interoperability between Cygwin and MS would be appreciated.
I have my Windows 6 and 7 platforms configured to build software using
different toolchains, the most common being (1) Visual Studio 10 and (2)
Folks,
Apologies for the dumb question and please re-direct if there is a better
forum.
How do I use cygwin *.h and *.dll in MS console programs?
If I include in a MS program I get many conflicts between
the cygwin CRT and MS CRT stuff. Is my only options to "port" the headers
to MS and dynam
Sorry I missing the last question. To answer it: yes perl really is visible
as /opt/perl/bin/perl which bash fails to execute it as the third line
below shows. In this shell bash execute cygwin perl on line 5.
ls: cannot access /opt/site/bin/perl: No such file or directory
ls: cannot access /opt
As requested the output from perl -e "print $^X;"
Bash 3 => c:\opt\perl\bin\perl.exe
Bash 4 => /usr/bin/perl
As you would expect the program that is actually running.
But again Bash 4 is incorrectly getting /usr/bin/perl rather
than /opt/perl/bin/perl
-Original Message-
From: Csaba Radu
Yes I'm certain. Below is a log of the following script
#--- script
$ echo "bash version = ${BASH_VERSINFO[0]}"
$ for i in $(echo $PATH | sed -r -e "s/:/ /g"); do echo $i; done
$ which perl
$ perl --version
$ /bin/bash
$ echo "bash version = ${BASH_VERSINFO[0]}"
$ for i in $(echo $P
Dear Folks,
The scripts /bin/set-gcc-default-[34].sh are written to use alternatives to
install gcc-3 and gcc-4. But /var/lib/alternatives/gcc is missing.
I tried to create it using g++ as an example but all functions failed with
an
error failed to read link /usr/bin/gcc.exe (which is the orgina
Folks,
I need associative arrays so I got the bash 4.0 source, compiled it under
cygwin
and installed it in /usr/local/bin.
I have ActiveState perl installed in /opt/perl which preceeds
/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
on my path. Using bash 4.0, 'which' says I should get ActiveState perl, but
actua
12 matches
Mail list logo