Re: accept() doesn't block while running as NT service

Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 06:10:06PM +0300, Nedko Arnaudov wrote: >> Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:23:01AM +0300, Nedko Arnaudov wrote: >> >> Process t

Re: accept() doesn't block while running as NT service

Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:23:01AM +0300, Nedko Arnaudov wrote: >> Process that is run under local system credentials cannot use >> network. This is why ot is called *local*. Don't know if this WinNT >> behaviour can

Re: accept() doesn't block while running as NT service

Process that is run under local system credentials cannot use network. This is why ot is called *local*. Don't know if this WinNT behaviour can be customized. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation:

Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak

This is the proof. http://www.faultcentral.org/personal/nedko/soft/pootag.JPG http://www.faultcentral.org/personal/nedko/soft/taskmanager.JPG -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cy

Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak

I have seen and reported similar problem with cygwin xfree86 i tracked down problem to SeOn kernel memory which means "Security Captured Object Name information". Thread is "Kernel memory leak caused by XWin.exe" within cygwin-xfree mailing list (news.gmane.org:gmane.os.cygwin.xfree) My system is w