AIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 2:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Enviroment always uppercased; Help me, please
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:06:06PM +0100, Markus K. E. Kommant wrote:
> >Idea:
> >
> >It would be better to support
and
everyting (in the wrong order).
The biggest problem, I can not switch it off.
best regards
Markus
> -----Original Message-
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Enviroment
---Original Message-
> From: Hack Kampbjørn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:50 PM
> To: Markus K. E. Kommant
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Enviroment always uppercased; Help me, please
>
>
> "Markus K. E. Kommant" wrote
MAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 6:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Enviroment always uppercased; Help me, please
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 06:46:57PM +0100, Markus K. E. Kommant wrote:
> >Seems to be a cygwin "feature" that the enviro
Seems to be a cygwin "feature" that the environment will be uppercased, when
called by a none cygwin program.
When puting a variable "gar=1" into the environment and call a program
compiled with gcc and cygwin, the result, when printing the environment,
will be
GAR=1
ups, gar != GAR, especially
> \??\C:\WIN2KPRO\system32\winlogon.exe
the \??\ could by "something" very special in the bootstrap of the system.
I belive, that it could be a \\?\?\
which will be chown as \??\ (\? interpreted as the escape sequence for ?)
The path \\?\?\ could be:
\\? = do not use "path parsing" and stay
6 matches
Mail list logo
