rly subtle
> corruption it might be visible in the debugger by viewing the assembly
> code at or near the point of failure.
>
>
> By the way, I'm certainly not offended, but I take it you were. That was
> not my intent. I'm sorry.
>
> Randall Schulz
> Mount
Then, I start to wonder why smbclient fails on a line where the example I
give, fails.
/me goes back to drawing board.
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:58:36PM -0000, Lee Packham wrote:
>> My bad, I mean char xx_blah[256];
>
> Works for me.
>
> Corinna
>
If I compile samba on the latest version of cygwin it now borks with a
>> segfault.
>>
>>It appears that pointer initialisation isn't quite working correctly.
>>
>>You can grab the patch for the samba source off the page above and see
>> what I mean.
>>
&g
My bad, I mean char xx_blah[256];
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:53:02PM -, Linux Mail Account wrote:
>> This used to work...
>>
>> char xx_blah[255];
>^^^
> Huh?
>
>> char *blah = xx_blah;
>>
>> for (int i = 0; i < 256; i++)
> ^^^
>
My bad... i mean xx_blah[256] ;)
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:53:02PM -, Linux Mail Account wrote:
>> This used to work...
>>
>> char xx_blah[255];
>^^^
> Huh?
>
>> char *blah = xx_blah;
>>
>> for (int i = 0; i < 256; i++)
> ^^^
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
