Larry Hall wrote:
BTW, I tried to put to put the object file that contain malloc/memalign
after
the Gtk+ libraries, and it didn't work. Glib does not call the Emacs
supplied
memalign in this case either.
Sounds odd. I assume the signature matches?
Yes they do. I will try so
Larry Hall wrote:
> Jan DjÃrv wrote:
>
> Yes it does thanks for the explanation. Cygwin has some mechanism that
> makes
> it possible for a program to supply its own malloc/free and friends I
> think
> (malloc_wrapper.cc). Would it be hard to also handle memalign/valloc and
>
Larry Hall wrote:
> With DLLs, symbol resolution happens at link time, not runtime. The only
> way to avoid this fact is to use dllopen (in Cygwin) or LoadLibrary (in
> Win32) and friends. If glib needs to reference something in Emacs, an
> import library with these symbol resolutions must appea
Larry Hall wrote:
Jan DjÃrv wrote:
Larry Hall wrote:
Jan D. wrote:
It seems that when Emacs defines its own malloc and friends, memalign
returns ENOSYS. But emacs defines its own memalign as well. Shouldn't
that one be called?
Seems like it though it sounds like something that would be
Larry Hall wrote:
> Jan D. wrote:
> It seems that when Emacs defines its own malloc and friends, memalign
> returns ENOSYS. But emacs defines its own memalign as well. Shouldn't that
> one be called?
Seems like it though it sounds like something that would be controlled by
the emacs configure s
Angelo Graziosi skrev:
Jan DjÃrv wrote:
It would be a small thing to figure out which part is used on cygwin if
the config.h was available.
Every time that the build of Emacs-CVS is configured with:
... ./configure --prefix=... --with-gtk
it fails when starting (on Cygwin) in this way:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Thanks much for the details. We do want to make things work correctly
but, if that just means some work in emacs source code, then someone who
is familiar with emacs will have to do that, i.e., someone else will
have to come up with the config.h.
OTOH, if someone cou
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:26:36AM +0100, Jan Dj??rv wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
If someone is positing that one of several functions possibly isn't
working in cygwin why not report exactly which function that would be?
I.e., a little more work than reposting spe
Christopher Faylor wrote:
If someone is positing that one of several functions possibly isn't
working in cygwin why not report exactly which function that would be?
I.e., a little more work than reposting speculation would be
appreciated.
I did that comment, it is not speculation. I currently
9 matches
Mail list logo
