I currently have vim version 8.0.596 from the (x64) package
"vim-8.0.0596-1 - vim: Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor".
'vi --version' says:
"VIM - Vi IMproved 8.0 (2016 Sep 12, compiled May 12 2017 11:38:40)
Included patches: 1-596
Modified by
Compiled by
Small version without GUI. Feature
Reini Urban wrote:
> Frank Slootweg schrieb:
> > A better solution would be one which 1) does *not* hardcode the
> > colors, 2) *does* use inverse video ("7") and 3) displays
> > white-on-black.
>
> Oh god, this man is insisting.
> The default white col
Thanks all for your responses.
Barry, you have given me a workaround and enabled me to find a second
workaround!
If people still want to try to find a better solution, I have
'attached' instructions on how to (try to) reproduce the problem.
Barry Buchbinder wrote:
[deleted]
> It is a fact
Thanks, Alejandro and Hannu, for your additional responses.
I am again getting closer, but still not there. Please bear with me.
At the time, I did not quite understand this part from Alejandro:
A> OK. In my experience, you can set the fg/bg colors the way you want
A> by modifying the syst
Alejandro López-Valencia wrote:
> At 04:33 a.m. 28/04/2004, Frank Slootweg wrote:
> > So I think the standout/'inverse video' colors are set somewhere
> > else, but I do not know where. That is the problem, and is confirmed
> > by the fact that "tput smso&
Alejandro López-Valencia wrote:
> At 03:05 a.m. 27/04/2004, Frank Slootweg wrote:
> > Please?
> >
> >On April 20, I wrote:
> >
> > > How can I set the colors of terminfo's standout (smso, so) mode?
> > >
> > > I have a termin
Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote:
> > From: [deleted] On Behalf Of Frank Slootweg
>
> FWIW:
>
> $ cat ~/.Xdefaults
> # XTerm == rxvt as rxvt simulates xterm
>
> rxvt.background:black
> rxvt.foreground:grey
> rxvt.visualBell:true
>
> .
Please?
On April 20, I wrote:
> How can I set the colors of terminfo's standout (smso, so) mode?
>
> I have a terminfo application (tin, the newsreader) which, as far as
> I can tell, uses standout mode to highlight things.
>
> I first used this on the old Cygwin B20 release and that gave
How can I set the colors of terminfo's standout (smso, so) mode?
I have a terminfo application (tin, the newsreader) which, as far as
I can tell, uses standout mode to highlight things.
I first used this on the old Cygwin B20 release and that gave white
text on a black background (normal te
Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 09:08:48PM +0200, Frank Slootweg wrote:
> > Anything else you need?
>
> Your /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf file would be interesting.
Here it is (wrapped (at 72 columns) by OE):
#
# /etc/ssmtp.conf
Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 04:46:13PM +0200, Frank Slootweg wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 03:30:39PM +0200, Frank Slootweg wrote:
> > [deleted]
> &g
Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 03:30:39PM +0200, Frank Slootweg wrote:
[deleted]
> > So my problem is solved, but what about the generic problem? IMO
> > ssmtp in a Cygwin environment should be able to handle DOS format
> &g
Olaf Foellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:57:27AM +0200, Frank Slootweg wrote:
> >
> > Does anybody have some other suggestions? Another tool which can
> > do the same job (i.e. read From:, To:, Subject: (and possibly Cc:
> > and B
Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 12:08:40PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 11:04:19AM +0100, Sam Edge wrote:
> > > Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > in gmane.os.cygwin on Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11
rn-Path: set
to FB is misrepresenting the real sender.
In hindsight, I probably agree with Felix van Hove that "-t" is not
supported, because while ssmtp does not complain about "-t", it says
this when using "-ba":
> /usr/sbin/ssmtp: -ba is not supported by
Felix van Hove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -t isn't supported, see man ssmtp.
>
> I have no problem to forward your message without this option, same
> ssmtp version 2.38.7.
I beg to differ (that -t isn't supported). (Of course) I have looked
into this in detail before I posted.
The SSMTP(8
t; where %F is a file which contains the header (lines), a blank line
> > (only \r\n) and body.
> >
> > I have found that apparently ssmtp keeps reading 'header' lines
> > (like From:, etc.) *after* it has read the full header, i.e. it also
> > reads 'hea
I have found that apparently ssmtp keeps reading 'header' lines (like
From:, etc.) *after* it has read the full header, i.e. it also reads
'header' lines from the *body* of the message. For example it will fail
(on the "From: Frank Slootweg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" lin
18 matches
Mail list logo
