Re: cygwin 1.7.35 absolute/relative path bug

2015-03-17 Thread Dmitry Bely
Corinna, Thanks, your snapshot works for me. - Dmitry Bely On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 17 15:05, Dmitry Bely wrote: >> Consider the following test case: >> >> [Makefile] >> .PHONY: default >> default: >> ./test.sh &

cygwin 1.7.35 absolute/relative path bug

2015-03-17 Thread Dmitry Bely
./test.sh But now Cygwin 1.7.35-1 gives: ./test.sh CYGWIN_NT-6.3 bely-win81 1.7.35(0.287/5/3) 2015-03-04 12:09 x86_64 Cygwin /cygdrive/c/Work/Test/Cygwin /cygdrive/c/Work/Test/Cygwin/test.sh Note that $0 was relative with 1.7.34, but now it's absolute. I believe it's a bug, isn'

Re: "Unable to remap" error

2004-04-12 Thread Dmitry Bely
he bug or the feature? :-) >>P.S. I'm trying to subscribe to the mailing list (either via Web or via email) >>but have no responce fro the server. Are there any problems with the mailing >>list software? > > Not AFAICS. Still don't work for me. Maybe I'

"Unable to remap" error

2004-04-12 Thread Dmitry Bely
quot;/usr/local/mailman/bin/mailmanctl", line 393, in main pid = os.fork() OSError: [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable [--- cut---] What this "unable to remap" error means? Can it be fixed some way? - Dmitry Bely P.S. I'm trying to subscribe to the mailing list (eithe

setfacl bug?

2004-04-10 Thread Dmitry Bely
_ONLY_ACE (default:other entry) which effectively prohibits any access. BTW, setfacl -s u::rwx,g::rwx,m:rwx,o:rwx,d:u::rwx,d:g::rwx,d:m:rwx,d:o:rwx . leads just to the same result (no access to the directory for "other" group) If my analysis is correct, could you fix this? - Dmitry Bely

Re: a problem with search path? (was: Multiple backslashes)

2002-02-12 Thread Dmitry Bely
"Stephan Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Latest everything. bash 2.05a.0(2) Cygwin DLL v 1.3.9-1. > stephan(); Just upgraded my installaton - still no success. What OS are you using? I currenly have Windows 2000 Workstation SP2 (build 2195) > > >From a bash shell: > > [~] bash -c "d:\\

Re: a problem with search path? (was: Multiple backslashes)

2002-02-12 Thread Dmitry Bely
Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Did you read the manual sections I referred you to? Yes. > CYGWIN=glob (withour without ":ignorecase") vs. CYGWIN=noglob _only_ > pertains when a non-Cygwin process invokes a Cygwin binary. > > Thus, "CYGWIN=[no]glob" is irrelevant when you're inv

Re: Multiple backslashes

2002-02-12 Thread Dmitry Bely
"Robinow, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Have you looked into the use of the XEmacs variable setq directory-sep-char? Hmm, it might really be the solution. Thank you very much for the idea. Hope to hear from you soon, Dmitry -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-

Re: a problem with search path? (was: Multiple backslashes)

2002-02-11 Thread Dmitry Bely
"Stephan Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >From a bash shell: > [~] bash -c "d:cygwinbinls.exe" > > >From cmd.exe > [D:\] bash -c "d:\\cygwin\\bin\\ls.exe" > > My CYGWIN variable includes glob:ignorecase But it does not work for me even with your settings :-( What is the vers

a problem with search path? (was: Multiple backslashes)

2002-02-11 Thread Dmitry Bely
Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm trying to help you, but you seem insistent on just declaring > Cygwin buggy. It is not and it is possible for you to resolve the > problem. I gave you all the information you need to do so. > > One last time, I'll answer your points... Randall,

Re: Multiple backslashes

2002-02-10 Thread Dmitry Bely
Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If your XEmacs is a Windows app and not a Cygwin one, then my caveats > apply because it is another example of a Windows process initiating a > Cygwin program. It's not acceptable? How then to invoke the bash itself :-) > From the Cygwin FAQ: > -=

Re: Multiple backslashes

2002-02-10 Thread Dmitry Bely
Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I said is accurate. However, in the absence of any explicit > mention on your part, I assumed you were issuing the commands you > specified from a Cygwin shell. It now appears you are entering them > into CMD.exe. > > If I'm not mistaken, argum

Re: Multiple backslashes

2002-02-10 Thread Dmitry Bely
Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Apart from the fact that this question involves Windows native path > name syntax (which, by the way, works equally well with forward > slashes), this is not Cygwin-specific. > > > There are two levels or rounds of interpretation of your command >

Multiple backslashes

2002-02-10 Thread Dmitry Bely
This is probably a FAQ, but can you explain me why bash -c "ls c:" requires 4 backslashes? I can understand why 2 BS is needed, but 4 BS IMHO are too much :-) Hope to hear from you soon, Dmitry -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http

Re: Xemacs/cygwin 21.4.3 and new console window during compilation

2001-12-18 Thread Dmitry Bely
Andy Piper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So my supposition is that a console window is created because XEmacs > doesn't have one by default when started from the desktop. Why then MSVC-compiled XEmacs does not popup new console in the same situation? It also seems not to have one by default ...