Re: Defunct processes with 1.5.25-15; seemingly reproducible

2009-11-28 Thread Dave Steenburgh
I "fixed" the problem. I have not updated any software nor changed any scripts, and yet I can no longer reproduce these behaviors. I am absolutely certain that there is more than one problem here, and I hope someone takes a close look at my previous posts. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin

Re: Defunct processes with 1.5.25-15; seemingly reproducible

2009-11-27 Thread Dave Steenburgh
Dave Steenburgh wrote: > And what is the significance of the duplicated lines that ps showed > me?  Each of three processes did indeed have a lock on an output file > from the most recent session, and yet all the information that ps > showed was identical to a previous session. I s

Re: Defunct processes with 1.5.25-15; seemingly reproducible

2009-11-27 Thread Dave Steenburgh
Paul McFerrin wrote: > A process is not necesarily the real "problem".  All > process are processes that their parent has NOT done a wait(2) yet.  Since > these processes have called exit(2), they must hang around until a > wait(2) is completed so that the exit status can be returned to the pare

Re: Defunct processes with 1.5.25-15; seemingly reproducible

2009-11-26 Thread Dave Steenburgh
to ask here first. Dave Steenburgh wrote: > $ ps > PIDPPIDPGID WINPID TTY UIDSTIME COMMAND > ... > 416412887684 55046 1003 23:49:20 > 539232245984 61005 1003 23:49:06 > 145252405984 81045 1

Re: GNU screen hangs

2009-09-02 Thread Dave Steenburgh
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 04:14:11PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: >>screen is difficult to debug, because it uses two communicating >>processes, one in the foreground to talk to your terminal, and one in >>the background to talk to the proc

Re: GNU screen hangs

2009-09-02 Thread Dave Steenburgh
/me returns to the original topic. I occasionally have trouble with screen as well, and as far as I can tell, it always happens when trying to create a new screen.  (To be clear, when I start screen the first time or when I press: ctrl-a c) So, it may be that screen itself is not the problem in my

g++-4 no output---resolved, but why?

2009-03-31 Thread Dave Steenburgh
I've been using gcc3 for some time, and decided to move to gcc4.  I did not remove gcc3.  I tried running a configure script for a personal project, specifying CXX=g++-4.  The script failed, because g++-4 didn't produce an executable when presented with conftest.cpp. It also didn't bother with an e

Re: Connecting to cygwin ssh is slow

2009-03-11 Thread Dave Steenburgh
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Allan Schrum wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On >> Behalf Of Dave Steenburgh >> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:45 AM >> To: cygwin@cygwin.com >> Subj

Re: Connecting to cygwin ssh is slow

2009-03-11 Thread Dave Steenburgh
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:05 AM, UdiK wrote: > When I connect to our cygwin SSH machine (Windows 2003 server), it usually > takes more than 5 seconds to get a prompt and be able to start working. This > delay slows down many of our scripts which rely on SSH to connect to > Windows. > > What cause

Re: Upgrade woes ("file in use")

2009-03-11 Thread Dave Steenburgh
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Tim McDaniel wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Nuzhna Pomoshch > wrote: >> >> During a recent upgrade of about a dozen packages, I saw >> the  Cygwin setup window progress normally ("deleting >> package xyz..."), and then up popped a window that said: >> >> "In-use

Re: configure cannot find boost libraries

2009-01-26 Thread Dave Steenburgh
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Greg Chicares wrote: > On 2009-01-26 23:28Z, Claude Sylvain wrote: > [...] >> It seems that boost library include files are not located in >> /usr/include/boost/, but in /usr/include/boost-1_33_1/boost, or something >> like >> that, depending of the cygwin version

Re: paste into vim

2009-01-23 Thread Dave Steenburgh
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: >>> >>> If you didn't get an insert key then you got ripped off however I think >>> you may just be looking in the wrong place, By Logitiech Y-SZ49 did you mean >>> this one: http://cafe.mobil.hr/showthread.php?t=49534 ? Be

Re: paste into vim

2009-01-21 Thread Dave Steenburgh
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Dave Steenburgh wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Morche Matthias >> wrote: >>> >>> or press Shift-Insert ... >> >> What about keyboards that don't have an insert key?

Re: paste into vim

2009-01-20 Thread Dave Steenburgh
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Morche Matthias wrote: > > or press Shift-Insert ... > What about keyboards that don't have an insert key? (Unfortunately all too common these days.) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/prob

Re: Bash doesn't launch the applications directly.

2009-01-15 Thread Dave Steenburgh
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Lenik on 1/14/2009 5:59 PM: >> Hi, all >> >> I noticed that when bash launches a program, for example win32 >> notepad.exe or cygwin sleep, it in fact launches another bash which >> launches the final program, >> >> Any idea? > > Ye

Re: after recent update, svn tools exiting with code 57

2008-12-31 Thread Dave Steenburgh
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:45 PM, David Rothenberger wrote: > On 12/31/2008 10:33 AM, Dave Steenburgh wrote: >> From time to time, I use setup.exe to update all the packages I have >> installed. After doing that earlier today, I found out that svn, >> svnadmin, and svnserv

Re: after recent update, svn tools exiting with code 57

2008-12-31 Thread Dave Steenburgh
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > Dave Steenburgh wrote: >> >> I haven't been able to find any info related to this problem; >> hopefully someone can point me in the right direction. >> >>> From time to time, I use se

after recent update, svn tools exiting with code 57

2008-12-31 Thread Dave Steenburgh
I haven't been able to find any info related to this problem; hopefully someone can point me in the right direction. >From time to time, I use setup.exe to update all the packages I have installed. After doing that earlier today, I found out that svn, svnadmin, and svnserve (and presumably all ot