RE: gcc crash (memory?)

2005-12-30 Thread Dan Stratila
> -Original Message- > From: Gerrit P. Haase [gerrit at familiehaase dot de] > Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 10:28 PM > To: Dan Stratila > Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: gcc crash (memory?) > > It turns out (a part of) the problem was that malloc and >

RE: gcc crash (memory?)

2005-12-30 Thread Dan Stratila
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Gerrit P. Haase [gerrit at familiehaase dot de] > Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 12:50 PM > To: Dan Stratila > Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: gcc crash (memory?) > > I use gcc 3.4.4. I have also this famous registry

Re: malloc/new allocate twice as much?

2005-12-30 Thread Dan Stratila
From: Krzysztof Duleba To: cygwin at cygwin dot com Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:23:20 +0100 Subject: Re: malloc/new allocate twice as much? References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>This is an issue I've discovered and reproduced while trying to compile >>polymake (see the thread "gcc crash (memory?)"

malloc/new allocate twice as much?

2005-12-30 Thread Dan Stratila
Hi, This is an issue I've discovered and reproduced while trying to compile polymake (see the thread "gcc crash (memory?)"). It seems that both malloc and new allocate take up twice the amount of memory needed. I wrote a short program to allocate and use memory in chunks (mem-test.cpp), and compi

RE: gcc crash (memory?)

2005-12-30 Thread Dan Stratila
Hi Gerrit, > -Original Message- > From: Gerrit P. Haase [freeweb at nyckelpiga dot de] > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:46 PM > To: Dan Stratila > Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: gcc crash (memory?) > Increase the size of your swap file, for me the

gcc crash (memory?)

2005-12-28 Thread Dan Stratila
Hi, I am experiencing a gcc/g++ crash when compiling polymake (the polyhedron manipulation utility at http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/polymake/, download at http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/polymake/download_choice.html): --- g++ -c -o facets_from_incidence.o -I../../../apps/polytope/include -I../../.

kerberos

2005-12-11 Thread Dan Stratila
Hi, I was wondering why (MIT) Kerberos is not an official cygwin package? There are many cons for it: 1) Kerberos is very useful to many people (e.g. MIT, Stanford, government agencies, large companies). It looks like it is becoming even more popular with Microsoft and the major Linux distributio