Re: tar incremental backup issue

--- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 10:30:29AM -0400, Alex Song wrote: > >I'm relying on incremental feature of tar for my backup need. After > >doing a lot of backups, I suddenly found an issue with this feature. > > > &

tar incremental backup issue

Hi, I'm relying on incremental feature of tar for my backup need. After doing a lot of backups, I suddenly found an issue with this feature. It seems if you move a file with an earlier date to the directory, the incremental backuped archive of this directory does NOT have this file! I'm using fo

RE: gcc bug, cygwin specific cygwin-1.3.10-1 gcc-2.95.3-5

hi, is end being a global variable specific to the C language (which i doubt) ? to gcc ? to cygwin ? to windows ? or is it ALWAYS the case ? thank you very much for your help. cheers, alex Alex Song DESIGN

RE: gcc bug, cygwin specific cygwin-1.3.10-1 gcc-2.95.3-5

r your help. cheers, alex ---- Alex Song DESIGN ENGINEER EDMI Product Development Division [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph : +61 7 3881 6443 FAX : +61 7 3881 6420 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting:

Re: gcc bug, cygwin specific cygwin-1.3.10-1 gcc-2.95.3-5

able in your program. reserved for what ? for gcc ? i didn't think end was a reserved word for the C language and i didn't think it is a reserved word for gcc either as it would compile and execute with gcc under non-cygwin (linux) environment. could someone clarify this ? cheers, a

gcc bug, cygwin specific cygwin-1.3.10-1 gcc-2.95.3-5

e variable was declared as static (static int end) there are not problems with that. hope you guys can help. cheers, alex Alex Song DESIGN ENGINEER EDMI Product Development Division [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph : +61 7 388