On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:15:40PM -0500, Eric D Hendrickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your reply. Again, to the point that this is an all volunteer
> effort.
>
> And not taking away from any of what you said.
>
> However, sorry I was not more clear. The issue here is as follows.
>
> Is
Hello,
Thanks for your reply. Again, to the point that this is an all volunteer
effort.
And not taking away from any of what you said.
However, sorry I was not more clear. The issue here is as follows.
Is Cygwin as a whole not more important than any one package?
Cygwin is distributing a sui
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 09:55:04PM -0500, Eric D Hendrickson via Cygwin wrote:
> Sorry for the unclarity - I meant this for the whole list - not just you.
>
> Thank you so much for taking the time to respond. Like you said, this
> really is all volunteers.
>
> For the whole list:
>
> Totally ta
Sorry for the unclarity - I meant this for the whole list - not just you.
Thank you so much for taking the time to respond. Like you said, this
really is all volunteers.
For the whole list:
Totally taking into account the all volunteer nature of Cygwin, would it
make sense to defer on further n
On 10/11/2023 6:36 PM, Hendrickson, Eric D wrote:
Hi Eliot,
Thanks for responding. That makes total sense.
Totally taking into account the all volunteer nature of Cygwin, would it make
sense to defer on further non-emergency releases of Cygwin until all packages
that are EOL have been update
From: "Hendrickson, Eric D via Cygwin"
Subject: Ruby EOL in Cygwin 3.4.9?
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:37:29 +
> Hello all,
>
> As a ~25 year user and sometime contributor to Cygwin, I support Cygwin here
> at my place of work. Does anyone know why we are deploying Ruby 2.6 which
> EOL about
Hi Eliot,
Thanks for responding. That makes total sense.
Totally taking into account the all volunteer nature of Cygwin, would it make
sense to defer on further non-emergency releases of Cygwin until all packages
that are EOL have been updated? Since this is the case with ruby, I am
guessi
On 10/11/2023 12:37 PM, Hendrickson, Eric D via Cygwin wrote:
Hello all,
As a ~25 year user and sometime contributor to Cygwin, I support Cygwin here at
my place of work. Does anyone know why we are deploying Ruby 2.6 which EOL
about 18 months ago?
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/downloads/bran
Good evening!
I have been looking for a way to debug programs on multiple targets of
different architectures via gdbserver. It seems that Cygwin currently doesn't
provide a gdb configured for this scenario.
The gdb from the Cygwin distribution isn't configured with
'--enable-targets=all'. I'm
Hello all,
As a ~25 year user and sometime contributor to Cygwin, I support Cygwin here at
my place of work. Does anyone know why we are deploying Ruby 2.6 which EOL
about 18 months ago?
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/downloads/branches/
I'm concerned about proliferation of EOL versions of Ruby
10 matches
Mail list logo
