Construction Estimates for USA General Contractors!!

2021-03-31 Thread Nationwide Estimates via Cygwin
-- We are offering upto 30 {%} off. We want you to be a success, so we offer a 24-48 hour turnaround time for most construction estimating services. Please provide us the drawings in PDF format or any link to the drawings if you have any project to estimate, and mention the scope of work so we ca

Re: FAST_CWD pointer

2021-03-31 Thread cygwinautoreply--- via Cygwin
>  1 [main] WIN32wgrib2 2356 find_fast_cwd: WARNING: Couldn't compute >FAST_CWD pointer https://cygwin.com/faq.html#faq.using.fixing-find_fast_cwd-warnings -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation:https://cygwi

FAST_CWD pointer

2021-03-31 Thread Dale Kendall via Cygwin
 1 [main] WIN32wgrib2 2356 find_fast_cwd: WARNING: Couldn't compute FAST_CWD pointer -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openblas-0.3.14-1

2021-03-31 Thread Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-announce via Cygwin
New releases 0.3.14-1 of openblas (source) libopenblas (dinamic library) are available in the Cygwin distribution : CHANGES Last upstream release bugfix and performance improvment https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/releases OpenBLAS will now provide enough buffer space for at le

Re: AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM is dropping messages

2021-03-31 Thread Ken Brown via Cygwin
On 3/31/2021 4:24 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems to drop messages or at least they are not received in the same order they are sent [snip] Thanks for the test case. I can confirm the problem. I'm not familiar

RE: AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM is dropping messages

2021-03-31 Thread Kristian Ivarsson via Cygwin
[snip] > >>> Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems to drop > >>> messages or at least they are not received in the same order they > >>> are sent [snip] > Thanks for the test case. I can confirm the problem. I'm not familiar enough > with the current AF_UNIX implementati