Stack trace question

2019-11-07 Thread Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin
Hi all, I have the following stack trace (64 bit Cygwin app), and I can't figure how the same frame RBP at 000C7B0 can be listed 3 consecutive times for various functions (RIPs). Also if I follow the stack trace with gdb (and the trace is all within Cygwin.dll based at 18004), it does

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] xterm 348-1

2019-11-07 Thread Katsumi Yamaoka
On Thu, 07 Nov 2019 11:39:36 +0900, Takashi Yano wrote: > Wait. I have just found /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm has a entry > *VT100*eightBitInput: false > which is added from cygwin xterm 348-1. > Removing this line or changing the value to true solves this issue. > Katsumi, could you please check

Re: Deeper stack trace please

2019-11-07 Thread Mark Geisert
Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin wrote: When Cygwin generates a stacktrace (coredump) is it possible to get more than 16 frames printed out? Looking at exceptions.cc, seems like not. Can it please be increased to 32, for example? I've submitted a patch for this enhancement. .

Deeper stack trace please

2019-11-07 Thread Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via cygwin
Hi, When Cygwin generates a stacktrace (coredump) is it possible to get more than 16 frames printed out? Looking at exceptions.cc, seems like not. Can it please be increased to 32, for example? Thanks, Anton -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: htt

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] xterm 348-1

2019-11-07 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2019-11-07 01:31, Thomas Wolff wrote: > Am 07.11.2019 um 03:39 schrieb Takashi Yano: >> ... >> Wait. I have just found /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm has a entry >> *VT100*eightBitInput: false >> which is added from cygwin xterm 348-1. >> >> Removing this line or changing the value to true solves t

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] xterm 348-1

2019-11-07 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2019-11-07 03:16, Takashi Yano wrote: > On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:31:24 +0100 > Thomas Wolff wrote: >> > ! Cygwin Defaults >> > +*backarrowKeyIsErase: true >> > +*metaSendsEscape: true >> > +*ptyInitialErase: true > > I guess these +'s at the beginning of the lines are just mistake, > and shoul

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] xterm 348-1

2019-11-07 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2019-11-07 01:31, Thomas Wolff wrote: > Am 07.11.2019 um 03:39 schrieb Takashi Yano: >> ... >> Wait. I have just found /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm has a entry >> *VT100*eightBitInput: false >> which is added from cygwin xterm 348-1. >> >> Removing this line or changing the value to true solves t

RE: International Security Expo (ISE) 2019 Show Mailing List

2019-11-07 Thread Susan Dauber
Hi, I am just doing a follow up with my previous email to check whether you are interested in our Contact Lists. Please pick the number which describes you. 1.Yes I am interested send me counts and pricing. 2.Leave out Thank you and I Look forward to hearing from you. Reg

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] xterm 348-1

2019-11-07 Thread Takashi Yano
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 09:31:24 +0100 Thomas Wolff wrote: > > ! Cygwin Defaults > > +*backarrowKeyIsErase: true > > +*metaSendsEscape: true > > +*ptyInitialErase: true I guess these +'s at the beginning of the lines are just mistake, and should be: ! Cygwin Defaults *backarrowKeyIsErase: true *met

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] xterm 348-1

2019-11-07 Thread Thomas Wolff
Am 07.11.2019 um 03:39 schrieb Takashi Yano: ... Wait. I have just found /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm has a entry *VT100*eightBitInput: false which is added from cygwin xterm 348-1. Removing this line or changing the value to true solves this issue. Katsumi, could you please check if this solves