RE: SMBFS mount's file cannot be made executable

Thanks for the hints! > so...what's your umask? It's 022. As far as it's concerned, umask should only be considered when creating a new file, not to affect existing files' modes (as with the chmod command). At any rate, the "x" bit in mine is unset, so should not be having the issues what you

HEADS UP package "fetchmail" vulnerable and 6.4.0 release candidate out

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Corinna, and everyone else who is interested, checking , I see that Cygwin packages a very old fetchmail version that has unfixed security vulnerabilities and unfixed critical (data loss) bugs.