On 2019-03-20 03:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 19 18:02, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> Just came across this with 3.0.4 on both Win7 and Win10 1804:
>>
>> $ ls -1 /usr/bin/python2.7
>> /usr/bin/python2.7
>> $ ls -1 /usr/bin/python[2-9].[0-9]
>> /usr/bin/python3.5
>> /usr/bin/python3.6
>> /usr/b
May be related to
"gost.dll required but missing after latest Cygwin update"
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2019-03/msg00511.html
--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is
On 2019-03-20 11:19, Alan wrote:
> This seems related to openssl 1.1.1b1 but it affects multiple other
> programs.
>
> For example dig no longer works:
>
> AlanG@Bytehouse-PC-01 ~
> $ dig bytehouse.co.uk any
> 20-Mar-2019 16:52:02.636 ENGINE_by_id failed (crypto failure)
> 20-Mar-2019 16:52:02.63
On 2019-03-20 09:06, Bill Stewart wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:53 AM Bruce Halco wrote:
>> The problem is I have 8 customers failing PCI network scans because of
>> CVE-2019-6111, so I don't think the patch for CVE-2018-20685 is going to
>> help.
>> If 8.0 is close (maybe weeks?) I can afford
Hi,
Welcome to Automate Show 08-11 April 2019 Chicago IL, USA. May we wish you
every success in the forthcoming exhibition.
We providing attendees contact information of Automate Show Available now to
send invitation and market your product before show as well as after the
show.
This seems related to openssl 1.1.1b1 but it affects multiple other
programs.
For example dig no longer works:
AlanG@Bytehouse-PC-01 ~
$ dig bytehouse.co.uk any
20-Mar-2019 16:52:02.636 ENGINE_by_id failed (crypto failure)
20-Mar-2019 16:52:02.637 error:25066067:DSO support
routines:dlfcn_load:co
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:53 AM Bruce Halco wrote:
> The problem is I have 8 customers failing PCI network scans because of
> CVE-2019-6111, so I don't think the patch for CVE-2018-20685 is going to
> help.
>
> If 8.0 is close (maybe weeks?) I can afford to wait a while. Otherwise
> I'll have to t
The problem is I have 8 customers failing PCI network scans because of
CVE-2019-6111, so I don't think the patch for CVE-2018-20685 is going to
help.
If 8.0 is close (maybe weeks?) I can afford to wait a while. Otherwise
I'll have to take some other action. I don't like any of my
alternatives
On Mar 20 09:13, Bruce Halco wrote:
> openSSH 7.9 is subject to vulnerability CVE-2019-6111. This has been fixed
> in at least some distributions, Debian at least.
Fedora (which is our role model) doesn't and the vulnerability is not
deemed that critical by the upstream maintainers:
https://lists
mercredi 20 mars 2019
Economie: pourquoi BAM maintient sont taux directeur inchangé (
http://newsletter.consonews.ma/index.php?subid=33983&option=com_acymailing&ctrl=url&urlid=4593&mailid=876
)
C’est la principale info à retenir à l’issue du Conseil de Bank Al Maghrib,
réuni hier à Rabat. L’ann
openSSH 7.9 is subject to vulnerability CVE-2019-6111. This has been
fixed in at least some distributions, Debian at least.
As the cygwin openSSH files are all dated October, 2018, it seems clear
that the fix has not yet been applied to cygwin.
Are there plans to address this?
Thanks.
Bruce
On Mar 19 18:02, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> Just came across this with 3.0.4 on both Win7 and Win10 1804:
>
> $ ls -1 /usr/bin/python2.7
> /usr/bin/python2.7
> $ ls -1 /usr/bin/python[2-9].[0-9]
> /usr/bin/python3.5
> /usr/bin/python3.6
> /usr/bin/python3.7
> /usr/bin/python3.8
>
> python2.7 is th
On 19.03.2019 23:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 19 22:28, LRN wrote:
>> The testcase is attached. Running it with Cygwin-i386 leads to a crash.
>
> I pushed a patch and uploaded new developer snapshots to
> https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>
> Pleas give them a try.
>
Gave them a try, doesn'
13 matches
Mail list logo
