Greetings. Is anybody maintaining the php 7.1 packages for cygwin anymore?
It's stuck at php 7.1.16 yet php 7.1 is up to 7.1.19 now. Surely there are
vulnerabilities that need to be addressed right? Any info on this is
appreciated.
Sent using Sharklasers.com
Block or report abuse:
what happens if you install mesa by cygwin setup ?
tatsuro
--- wfmacmd
> Thanks for the suggestions.
>
> I thought updating the display driver sounded good, since this is a very
> old computer, but when I asked to update the driver it searched for a new
> driver and eventually said my driver is
Thanks for the suggestions.
I thought updating the display driver sounded good, since this is a very
old computer, but when I asked to update the driver it searched for a new
driver and eventually said my driver is up to date.
I set LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE to 1. That got rid of the WGL error messa
On 2018-06-27 03:31, john doe wrote:
> Good morning Brian, bottom posting.
> By Windows Admin you mean "Windows Admin Center"?
Line wrapped - Windows Admin Tools - on W10 - or search for event (log) viewer
> I'm using Cygwin on a laptop (win 7 pro) and sadly, if I'm not mistaking,
> "Windows Adm
Hi,
I just wanted to check if you would be interested in a list of Managed
Service Providers (MSPs) and Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs)?
• Managed Service Providers (MSP’s) – 25,000 unique companies
• Managed Security Service Providers (MSSP’s) – 7,520 unique
compa
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 20:01:16 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> Simple test case (chkperror.c) attached checks this behavior.
The test case seems to be garbled, so I re-submit it compressed by gzip.
--
Takashi Yano
chkperror.c.gz
Description: Binary data
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/
POSIX states:
The perror() function shall not change the orientation of the standard
error stream.
However, cygwin perror() function changes the orientation of stderr to
byte-oriented mode if stderr is not oriented yet.
Simple test case (chkperror.c) attached checks this behavior.
Expected resul
On 6/27/2018 9:45 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, john doe!
In gnupg2 the use of dirmngr utility is required to interact with a
keyserver.
Dirmngr requires that '/etc/resolv.conf' be populated with my name servers.
Looks like an upstream bug. /etc/resolv.conf is not a required file for
Good morning Brian, bottom posting.
On 6/26/2018 4:18 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2018-06-26 04:33, john doe wrote:
In gnupg2 the use of dirmngr utility is required to interact with a keyserver.
Dirmngr requires that '/etc/resolv.conf' be populated with my name servers.
That means that everytim
Greetings, john doe!
> In gnupg2 the use of dirmngr utility is required to interact with a
> keyserver.
> Dirmngr requires that '/etc/resolv.conf' be populated with my name servers.
Looks like an upstream bug. /etc/resolv.conf is not a required file for DNS
resolution.
> That means that everyti
10 matches
Mail list logo