On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:22:35PM -0500, cyg Simple wrote:
>The cygwin-annou...@cygwin.com list forwards email to the
>cygwin@cygwin.com list. That email is missing the Message-Id header.
>My email provider, gmail.com, adds the header with a suffix indicating
>that it was added by the provider.
On 2017-12-20 17:08, Vijaya Subramanian wrote:
> Thanks a lot. This worked but only with the new version of setup.exe that is
> out
> right now.
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 19, 2017, 11:22:39 PM MST, Brian Inglis
> wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-12-19 22:47, Vijaya Subramanian wrote:
>> On 2017-12-19 10
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 18:56:12, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
What need do you specifically have for static libraries?
its not a need - its a preference - i prefer static builds - the count of
programs i regularly build is small, so the redundancy doesnt hurt my use case.
also if I am to share my build
On 2017-12-20 17:58, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:01:35, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
>>
>> * mingw64-i686-fdk-aac-0.1.5-2
>> * mingw64-x86_64-fdk-aac-0.1.5-2
>
> Can we get a static library along with the shared l
Thanks a lot. This worked but only with the new version of setup.exe that is
out right now.
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017, 11:22:39 PM MST, Brian Inglis
wrote:
On 2017-12-19 22:47, Vijaya Subramanian wrote:
> On 2017-12-19 10:43, Vijaya Subramanian via cygwin wrote:
>>On Tuesday, Dec
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:01:35, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* libfdk-aac1-0.1.5-2
* libfdk-aac-devel-0.1.5-2
* mingw64-i686-fdk-aac-0.1.5-2
* mingw64-x86_64-fdk-aac-0.1.5-2
Can we get a static library along with the shared library
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Greg Taylor
wrote:
> I downloaded the file setup-x86_64.exe again and now the scan reports no
> threats.
>
> Version 2.882 was all clear
> Version 2.883 downloaded at 12:30pm reported a threat
> Version 2.883 downloaded at 2:14pm PST was all clear
>
To clear up t
On 18.12.2017 16:27, Steven Penny wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:10:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
In general, the writes on disk devices is sector-oriented. Howewver,
in this case ftell should have returned 65536. The problem here is
that the newlib implmentation of ftell/ftello performs an fflus
On 2017-12-20 05:59, Enrique Perez-Terron wrote:
> Lately, whenever I run setup (x86), my /var/log/setup.log.full contains:
> 2017/12/20 03:07:44 running: C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe --norc --noprofile
> "/etc/postinstall/cygwin-doc.sh"
> mkshortcut: Saving "/cygdrive/c/ProgramData/Microsoft/Windows/S
[Once again, please don't top-post on this list.]
On 12/20/2017 3:48 PM, Vijaya Subramanian wrote:
Is there any reason why Norton would have removed only one dll and left
all the others alone?
I have no idea. Do you know that none of the others are missing? Does
'cygcheck -c' show that all
I downloaded the file setup-x86_64.exe again and now the scan reports no
threats.
Version 2.882 was all clear
Version 2.883 downloaded at 12:30pm reported a threat
Version 2.883 downloaded at 2:14pm PST was all clear
I looked in the logs and there was a WS.Reputation.1 risk which is
essentially a
Just tell Norton you trust the application-it will say too few users but also
give you the option to say you trust the app.
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017, 2:44:33 PM MST, Sean Murphy
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Greg Taylor wrote:
> On 12/20/17 @ 12;20pm PST I downloade
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Greg Taylor wrote:
> On 12/20/17 @ 12;20pm PST I downloaded the most recent version of
> setup-x86_64.exe which was flagged as a threat by Norton Antivirus.
It means Norton's heuristics jump the gun about Cygwin's setup. I
encountered this quite a few times in th
On 12/20/17, Greg Taylor wrote:
> On 12/20/17 @ 12;20pm PST I downloaded the most recent version of
> setup-x86_64.exe which was flagged as a threat by Norton Antivirus.
What does https://www.virustotal.com say about the file? (I get 0/67
- all clean)
You can also download https://cygwin.com/s
Is there any reason why Norton would have removed only one dll and left all the
others alone?
On Wednesday, December 20, 2017, 1:16:05 PM MST, Ken Brown
wrote:
[Please don't top-post on this list.]
On 12/20/2017 1:05 PM, Vijaya Subramanian via cygwin wrote:
> Hi,I found two instance
On 12/20/17 @ 12;20pm PST I downloaded the most recent version of
setup-x86_64.exe which was flagged as a threat by Norton Antivirus.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscri
[Please don't top-post on this list.]
On 12/20/2017 1:05 PM, Vijaya Subramanian via cygwin wrote:
Hi,I found two instances of liblz4-1 (the old version 131) installed in the
following directory.windows
c:/cygwin65/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/binDo you think that is what
is causing t
Hi,I found two instances of liblz4-1 (the old version 131) installed in the
following directory.windows
c:/cygwin65/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/binDo you think that is what
is causing the problem?
When I update cygwin, I believe I updated all the recommended packages
including mingw.
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* gobject-introspection-1.52.1-2
* libgirepository1.0_1-1.52.1-2
* libgirepository1.0-devel-1.52.1-2
* libgirepository1.0-doc-1.52.1-2
* girepository-cairo1.0-1.52.1-2
* girepository-GIRepository2.0-1.52.1-2
* girepository-GLib2
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* appstream-glib-0.7.4-1
* appstream-builder-0.7.4-1
* libappstream-glib8-0.7.4-1
* libappstream-glib-devel-0.7.4-1
* libappstream-glib-doc-0.7.4-1
* libappstream-builder8-0.7.4-1
* libappstream-builder-devel-0.7.4-1
* gireposit
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* appstream-0.11.7-1
* libappstream4-0.11.7-1
* libappstream-devel-0.11.7-1
* libappstream-doc-0.11.7-1
* girepository-AppStream1.0-0.11.7-1
* vala-appstream-0.11.7-1
* libAppStreamQt2-0.11.7-1
* libAppStreamQt-devel-0.11.7-1
A
Cygwin installer annoys virus checkers which never used to care. White list
setup.exe before casting blame
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
Original message From: Arkady Date:
12/20/17 7:37 AM (GMT-05:00) To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: c
On 12/20/2017 06:59 AM, Enrique Perez-Terron wrote:
So I have added a line "set -x" at the top in postinstall/cygwin-doc.sh,
and the relevant section becomes
+ read target name desc
+ '[' -r ']'
(by the way -- this reveals another bug too: The script says "[ -r $t ]
&& $mks ..." wher
On 20/12/2017 12:43, Arkady wrote:
I can upload VirtualBox VM which demonstrates the problem - this is
14GB image for VirtualBox 5.1.30
Please don't.
In any case, you might wish to consult the license you have for Windows
to see if you are permitted to do this...
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:
On 19/12/2017 18:35, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2017-12-19 10:43, Vijaya Subramanian via cygwin wrote:
I checked /var/log/setup-full.log and found the below instances where libz4-1
was mentioned
package liblz4-devel comparing versions 131-1 and 131-1, result was 0
package liblz4_1 comparing version
Lately, whenever I run setup (x86), my /var/log/setup.log.full contains:
2017/12/20 03:07:44 running: C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe --norc --noprofile
"/etc/postinstall/cygwin-doc.sh"
mkshortcut: Saving "/cygdrive/c/ProgramData/Microsoft/Windows/Start
Menu/Programs/C:/cygwin/User Guide (PDF).lnk" fa
I can upload VirtualBox VM which demonstrates the problem - this is
14GB image for VirtualBox 5.1.30
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Arkady wrote:
> Another clue - flags -d -n -N probably solve the problem or make the
> problem very rare
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Arkady wrote:
>> I h
Another clue - flags -d -n -N probably solve the problem or make the
problem very rare
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Arkady wrote:
> I have little doubt that here is a bug in the Cygwin installer. I
> reproduce the problem
> consistently. I use the following command 10 times
> setup-x86.exe -q
I have little doubt that here is a bug in the Cygwin installer. I
reproduce the problem
consistently. I use the following command 10 times
setup-x86.exe -q -s http://cygwin.mirror.constant.com
The setup fails one time of three in my Win10 64 bits setup.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Arkady wro
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Arkady writes:
>> setup-x86_64.exe -q -p wget -v
>>
>> The installation fails with the last line "Changing gid to
>> Administrators" and a small dialog box "setup-x86_64.exe" has stopped
>> working A problem caused the program to stop working
Hi Darmie,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Darmie Akinlaja wrote:
> I tried building LLVM / Clang 5.0 but it's failing.
>
> This is the error I am getting:
>
> [ 63%] Building CXX object lib/Passes/CMakeFiles/LLVMPasses.dir/PassBuilder.
> cpp.o
It might be useful to see the actual command line
Arkady writes:
> Another update: the quite mode sometimes succeeds. I estimate that the
> success rate is 30%. It rarely succeeds very first time.
>
> The problem is definitely not new. See, for example,
> https://github.com/boxcutter/windows/blob/master/floppy/cygwin.bat#L50
> The batch start with
Arkady writes:
> setup-x86_64.exe -q -p wget -v
>
> The installation fails with the last line "Changing gid to
> Administrators" and a small dialog box "setup-x86_64.exe" has stopped
> working A problem caused the program to stop working correctly..."
That is usually caused by BLODA that recognize
33 matches
Mail list logo
