On 12/20/2015 5:50 PM, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Hi,
When I clone a git repo in Cygwin all files get execution permission for
the group.
I can remove the execution permissions by hand. When I pull a new
update, the group execute permission is back for the new files.
How can I fix this?
Try this
Hello to everyone following along.
Pierre and I worked off-line on this problem.
We didn't yet figure out how to run cron as self (using cron-config and
specifying self) on Windows 10 with a Microsoft Id.
We did figure out another approach though that does work on Windows 10
with a Microsoft Id:
Hi,
When I clone a git repo in Cygwin all files get execution permission for
the group.
I can remove the execution permissions by hand. When I pull a new
update, the group execute permission is back for the new files.
How can I fix this?
regards,
Erwin
--
Problem reports: http://cygw
Hi Corinna,
According to acl(5), the mask entry (as reported by getacl) is
"optional" if the
acl contains no 'u:uid:perm' and/or 'g:gid:perm' entries (ace's) ...
Ahem.
VALID ACLs (from acl(5) )
A valid ACL contains exactly one entry with each of the
ACL_USER_OBJ,
ACL_GROUP_OBJ, a
On 20/12/2015 13:31, Houder wrote:
>
> Yes Corinna, I "heard" you the first time ...
>
> ... as I said, it must be my __old__ age. Let us stop at that.
>
> Regards,
> Henri
>
>
Should I be asking for subscriptions to the System V wrinklies' club at
this point? :-;
(Wasn't expecting my little polem
On 2015-12-20 14:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 20 13:55, Houder wrote:
On 2015-12-20 13:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Dec 20 12:50, incog wrote:
>>On 2015-12-20 12:41, Sam Edge wrote:
>>>On 18/12/2015 13:06, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
and (of all things!) contain blanks,
>>>
>>>* rant mo
On Dec 20 13:55, Houder wrote:
> On 2015-12-20 13:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Dec 20 12:50, incog wrote:
> >>On 2015-12-20 12:41, Sam Edge wrote:
> >>>On 18/12/2015 13:06, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> and (of all things!) contain blanks,
> >>>
> >>>* rant mode on *
> >>>
> >>>What's wrong wi
On 2015-12-20 13:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 20 12:50, incog wrote:
On 2015-12-20 12:41, Sam Edge wrote:
>On 18/12/2015 13:06, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
>>and (of all things!) contain blanks,
>
>* rant mode on *
>
>What's wrong with blanks?
>
>The OS calls don't give a monkey's chuff so lon
On Dec 20 12:50, incog wrote:
> On 2015-12-20 12:41, Sam Edge wrote:
> >On 18/12/2015 13:06, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> >>and (of all things!) contain blanks,
> >
> >* rant mode on *
> >
> >What's wrong with blanks?
> >
> >The OS calls don't give a monkey's chuff so long as they're given
> >null-ter
On Dec 20 12:29, Houder wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> Euh ... I do not pretend to be familiar (less understand) with the features
> that go into 2.4.0 (as I have no need for them) ...
>
> ... but, by just browsing the source code of setfacl and by just looking at
> the user interface of setfacl ... Se
On 2015-12-20 12:41, Sam Edge wrote:
On 18/12/2015 13:06, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
and (of all things!) contain blanks,
* rant mode on *
What's wrong with blanks?
The OS calls don't give a monkey's chuff so long as they're given
null-terminated C-strings. Tools like find, xargs etc. have opti
On 18/12/2015 13:06, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> and (of all things!) contain blanks,
* rant mode on *
What's wrong with blanks?
The OS calls don't give a monkey's chuff so long as they're given
null-terminated C-strings. Tools like find, xargs etc. have options to cope.
The biggest problem is t
Hi Corinna,
Euh ... I do not pretend to be familiar (less understand) with the
features
that go into 2.4.0 (as I have no need for them) ...
... but, by just browsing the source code of setfacl and by just looking
at
the user interface of setfacl ... See below.
Regards,
Henri
Source code of
13 matches
Mail list logo
