Re: Problem with latest setup-x86.exe

2013-11-19 Thread Harry G McGavran Jr
Corinna Vinschen writes: > > Achim Gratz writes: > > > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > >> I just explained that in a reply an the cygwin-apps list: > > >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-11/msg00075.html > > >> > > >> I applied a patch to setup which should fix the issue. > > > > > > The patch W

Re: : Subversion packages

2013-11-19 Thread Conrad Halling
On 11/17/13, 6:28 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: Greetings, David Stacey! Regarding you second point: My second point is that I can't tell from looking at a directory, if I'm inside a working copy or not. Launching any additional tools to do simple telling is not an option. This is a major drawback f

RE: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64

2013-11-19 Thread Jim Garrison
> On Nov 19 14:20, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > > On 11/19/2013 2:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >Looks like it, yes. What on earth were they thinking? > > > > Who says they were thinking? ;-) > > Point. > > I found what happened: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en- > us/library/windows/desktop/

Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64

2013-11-19 Thread Warren Young
On 11/19/2013 10:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Why do they have to make such a mess out of a simple function like GetVersionEx? Backwards compatibility at all costs? How dense is that? Manifest Density. (American joke.) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64

2013-11-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 19 22:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 20 00:59, Andrey Repin wrote: > > Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! > > > > > Why isn't there at least an additional non-manifest way to claim > > > compatibility with the current OS? :( > > > > Because this "claim" is informational, or at least it sho

Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64

2013-11-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 20 00:59, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! > > > Why isn't there at least an additional non-manifest way to claim > > compatibility with the current OS? :( > > Because this "claim" is informational, or at least it should be. But apparently it isn't. It's enforced. Howe

Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64

2013-11-19 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! > Why isn't there at least an additional non-manifest way to claim > compatibility with the current OS? :( Because this "claim" is informational, or at least it should be. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdae...@yandex.ru) 20.11.2013, <00:56> Sorry for my terrible english.

Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64

2013-11-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 19 21:29, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 19 14:20, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > > On 11/19/2013 2:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >On Nov 19 13:21, Charles Wilson wrote: > > >>On 11/19/2013 12:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >>>Why do they have to make such a mess out of a simple fun

Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64

2013-11-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 19 14:20, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > On 11/19/2013 2:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Nov 19 13:21, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>On 11/19/2013 12:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>Why do they have to make such a mess out of a simple function like > >>>GetVersionEx? It returns different

Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64

2013-11-19 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 11/19/2013 2:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Nov 19 13:21, Charles Wilson wrote: On 11/19/2013 12:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Why do they have to make such a mess out of a simple function like GetVersionEx? It returns different OS version numbers based on the existence of a manifest in

Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64

2013-11-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 19 13:21, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 11/19/2013 12:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Why do they have to make such a mess out of a simple function like > >GetVersionEx? It returns different OS version numbers based on the > >existence of a manifest in the executable. How dense is that? > >

Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64

2013-11-19 Thread Charles Wilson
On 11/19/2013 12:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Why do they have to make such a mess out of a simple function like GetVersionEx? It returns different OS version numbers based on the existence of a manifest in the executable. How dense is that? So we have thousands of executables, none of them

Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64

2013-11-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 19 09:37, Warren Young wrote: > On 11/19/2013 03:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > >I'm also going > >to look for a solution to differ between Windows 8 and 8.1 (also 2012 > >vs. 2012R2) in the cygcheck output. > > GetVersionEx() should do it: http://goo.gl/DbhsRJ > > If you follow the lin

Re: Problem with latest setup-x86.exe

2013-11-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 19 09:30, Harry G McGavran Jr wrote: > Achim Gratz writes: > > Corinna Vinschen writes: > >> I just explained that in a reply an the cygwin-apps list: > >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-11/msg00075.html > >> > >> I applied a patch to setup which should fix the issue. > > > > The patc

Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64

2013-11-19 Thread Warren Young
On 11/19/2013 03:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote: I'm also going to look for a solution to differ between Windows 8 and 8.1 (also 2012 vs. 2012R2) in the cygcheck output. GetVersionEx() should do it: http://goo.gl/DbhsRJ If you follow the link to the OSVERSIONINFO structure, you will find a table

Re: Problem with latest setup-x86.exe

2013-11-19 Thread Harry G McGavran Jr
Achim Gratz writes: > Corinna Vinschen writes: >> I just explained that in a reply an the cygwin-apps list: >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2013-11/msg00075.html >> >> I applied a patch to setup which should fix the issue. > > The patch WJFFM. > But in line 266 of main.cc set_cout() is still c

Re: Is package-grep.cgi's desig architecture biased?

2013-11-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:27:48PM +0200, Sophoklis Goumas wrote: >On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:23 PM, marco atzeri wrote: >> the two reports are separated >> >> http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=cygutils-extra&arch=x86_64 >> > >I know and hence this discussion. > >But should omitting

Re: Is package-grep.cgi's desig architecture biased?

2013-11-19 Thread Sophoklis Goumas
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:23 PM, marco atzeri wrote: > the two reports are separated > > http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=cygutils-extra&arch=x86_64 > I know and hence this discussion. But should omitting the arch criteria, tha being the '&arch=x86_64' part of the the URI return

Re: Is package-grep.cgi's desig architecture biased?

2013-11-19 Thread marco atzeri
Il 11/19/2013 12:04 PM, Sophoklis Goumas ha scritto: Hello everyone, and a special hello to this mailing list's regulars! Shouldn't the following: http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=cygutils-extra return results for both x86 and x86_64 architectures? Sophoklis the two reports a

Is package-grep.cgi's desig architecture biased?

2013-11-19 Thread Sophoklis Goumas
Hello everyone, and a special hello to this mailing list's regulars! Shouldn't the following: http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=cygutils-extra return results for both x86 and x86_64 architectures? Sophoklis -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64

2013-11-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 18 21:35, Gabriel Marcano wrote: > cygcheck -svc causes a segfault on Windows 8.1 on line 1610 of cygcheck.cc, > based on gdb output. I'm including some gdb output below that showcases this > issue: > > > 1610    strcat (osname, products[prod]); > (gdb) list > 1605