The following packages (and their subpackages) have been updated for
both arches:
* iceauth-1.0.6-1
* libgsf-1.14.27-1
* mingw64-i686-bzip2-1.0.6-3
* mingw64-i686-libgcrypt-1.5.3-1
* mingw64-i686-libgpg-error-1.12-1
* mingw64-i686-xz-5.0.5-1
* mingw64-i686-zlib-1.2.8-2
* perl-ExtUtils-Depends-0.
On 7/25/2013 11:13 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> It has been suggested here a couple of times that it might be a good
> idea for Cygwin to fill out the block that it sends to subprocesses with
> information that fools msvcrt programs into thinking that its ptys are
> really consoles.
My suggesti
It has been suggested here a couple of times that it might be a good
idea for Cygwin to fill out the block that it sends to subprocesses with
information that fools msvcrt programs into thinking that its ptys are
really consoles.
Back in 2010, there was a flurry of discussion that I shot down, hop
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 05:44:02AM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>On 26 July 2013 05:14, Warren Young wrote:
>> On 7/25/2013 17:06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>>
>>> I might personally prefer to describe and list them differently.
>>
>>
>> DONOPWOL:
>>
>> DOes
>> NOt
>> Play
>> Well with
>> Others
>> L
On 7/25/2013 22:44, Andy Koppe wrote:
unfortunately that list would be very long anyway: basically anything
interactive that hasn't been explicitly adapted to Cygwin ptys,
Well, that gives me my example, anyway: c:\windows\system32\ftp.exe.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.
Greetings, Angelo Graziosi!
>> This is a bugfix update.
> After this update, my Cygwin installation is basically broken. I have
> several links on desktop to start Cygwin applications and they don't
> work any more. The links target sound like these:
>C:\cygwin-2\bin\run.exe bash -l -c '
On 2013-07-12 05:33, JonY wrote:
For gcc-4.7.x, struct alignment behavior has changed, -mms-bitfields is
now default, for better MSVC compatibility. This may cause ABI changes
in libraries that expose data structures directly to clients. Workaround
include marking the struct with the gcc_struct a
On 26 July 2013 05:14, Warren Young wrote:
> On 7/25/2013 17:06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>
>> I might personally prefer to describe and list them differently.
>
>
> DONOPWOL:
>
> DOes
> NOt
> Play
> Well with
> Others
> List
I don't think that's fair, since such apps were designed for the
Wind
On 7/26/2013 12:14 AM, Warren Young wrote:
On 7/25/2013 17:06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
I might personally prefer to describe and list them differently.
DONOPWOL:
DOes
NOt
Play
Well with
Others
List
Now doesn't that just roll off the tongue? ;-)
--
Larry
On 7/25/2013 17:06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
I might personally prefer to describe and list them differently.
DONOPWOL:
DOes
NOt
Play
Well with
Others
List
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://c
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> 'cygcheck /usr/bin/fetchmail.exe' for me shows a dependency on
> cygssl-1.0.0.dll, not cygssl-0.9.8.dll. You might want to check your
> versions of executables, DLLs, and packages. If you can't figure out why
> you see this dependency, you can ju
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:16:10AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>On 7/26/2013 01:20, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:10:17AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>>> On 7/25/2013 23:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'm still a (silent) gcc maintainer so I can presumably accept this patch.
>
On 7/25/2013 7:22 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
Did a new installation this afternoon, ran into a problem with fetchmail:
/usr/bin/fetchmail.exe: error while loading shared libraries:
cygssl-0.9.8.dll: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
The version of cygssl that installed, wa
Did a new installation this afternoon, ran into a problem with fetchmail:
/usr/bin/fetchmail.exe: error while loading shared libraries:
cygssl-0.9.8.dll: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
The version of cygssl that installed, was 1.0.0:
/usr/bin/cygssl-1.0.0.dll
I tried
On 7/25/2013 6:36 PM, Warren Young wrote:
I don't see any console programs on the BLODA. Shouldn't it include
programs that break under Cygwin due to things like the change from Windows
console to mintty, or the pty (?) work that improves Linux/POSIX semantics?
Generally speaking, BLODA is a t
On 7/25/2013 6:23 PM, J.P.Abelanet wrote:
Here is the problem summary:
- Cannot build debug/-Zi using VS 2010 SP1 via ssh with public key auth from
local administrator account
-- - xxx.cpp : fatal error C1902: Program database manager mismatch; please
check your installation
- Can build debug
I don't see any console programs on the BLODA. Shouldn't it include
programs that break under Cygwin due to things like the change from
Windows console to mintty, or the pty (?) work that improves Linux/POSIX
semantics?
Then there are the even older class of programs that didn't work right
e
Here is the problem summary:
- Cannot build debug/-Zi using VS 2010 SP1 via ssh with public key auth from
local administrator account
-- - xxx.cpp : fatal error C1902: Program database manager mismatch; please
check your installation
- Can build debug using -Zi via ssh using password authenticat
On 7/26/2013 01:20, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:10:17AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>> On 7/25/2013 23:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm still a (silent) gcc maintainer so I can presumably accept this patch.
>>>
>>> Are there outstanding patches that need attention? If so
Tom Honermann sent the following at Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:53 PM
Does this (or a variation thereof) do what you want?
c:\cygwin\bin\procps -A --format cmd
- Barry
Disclaimer: Statements made herein are not made on behalf of NIAID.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 09:21:31AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>On 7/25/2013 4:28 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jul 24 22:38, Tom Honermann wrote:
>>> My suspicion that this started with 1.7.21 is based on Corinna's
>>> comments in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-07/msg00343.html and
>>> othe
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 01:52:59PM -0400, Tom Honermann wrote:
>On 07/25/2013 01:18 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Tom Honermann wrote:
>>> On 07/25/2013 11:21 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:10:50AM -0400, Christopher Faylor
On 07/25/2013 01:18 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Tom Honermann wrote:
On 07/25/2013 11:21 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:10:50AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
It's not strace that's broken. That's just a simple fix to the
The serf packages have been updated to the new upstream release
1.3.0. See
http://serf.googlecode.com/svn/tags/1.3.0/CHANGES
for more details about the changes in this release.
More information about serf can be found at
http://code.google.com/p/serf/.
CYGWIN NOTES:
=
The 1.3.0-1
NEWS:
=
See CHANGES (URL below) for more information about the differences
between 1.8.0 and previous Subversion releases.
IMPORTANT: Please read the release notes (URL below) before
upgrading from a previous major release. 1.8 includes a new working
copy format with a manual upgrade operation
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:10:17AM +0800, JonY wrote:
>On 7/25/2013 23:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> I'm still a (silent) gcc maintainer so I can presumably accept this patch.
>>
>> Are there outstanding patches that need attention? If so, please send URLs
>> from the gcc-patches archive h
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Tom Honermann wrote:
>On 07/25/2013 11:21 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:10:50AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> It's not strace that's broken. That's just a simple fix to the DLL.
>>
>> Actually, nevermind. It's not a bu
A new version of libargp, 20110921-2, is available in the Cygwin archive.
This release fixes a Windows-specific bug in the previous release, in which
the optional variables supported by argp (argp_program_version,
argp_program_version_hook, argp_program_bug_address, argp_err_exit_status)
didn't ta
On 7/25/2013 23:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> I'm still a (silent) gcc maintainer so I can presumably accept this patch.
>
> Are there outstanding patches that need attention? If so, please send URLs
> from the gcc-patches archive here so that I can attend to them.
>
This libgcc patch, and
On 07/25/2013 11:21 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:10:50AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
It's not strace that's broken. That's just a simple fix to the DLL.
Actually, nevermind. It's not a bug.
Could you elaborate? Prior to 1.7.21, strace provided the command
On 07/25/2013 11:10 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:19:16AM -0400, Tom Honermann wrote:
On 07/25/2013 09:21 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 7/25/2013 4:28 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 24 22:38, Tom Honermann wrote:
My suspicion that this started with 1.7.21 is base
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:10:50AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>It's not strace that's broken. That's just a simple fix to the DLL.
Actually, nevermind. It's not a bug.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentatio
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:54:03PM +0800, JonY wrote:
>On 7/25/2013 18:18, JonY wrote:
>> On 7/25/2013 17:17, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Jul 25 01:36, Daniel Colascione wrote:
On 7/25/2013 12:11 AM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> On 7/24/2013 11:55 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>> Does
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:19:16AM -0400, Tom Honermann wrote:
>On 07/25/2013 09:21 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> On 7/25/2013 4:28 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Jul 24 22:38, Tom Honermann wrote:
My suspicion that this started with 1.7.21 is based on Corinna's
comments in http://cygw
On 07/25/2013 09:21 AM, Charles Wilson wrote:
On 7/25/2013 4:28 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 24 22:38, Tom Honermann wrote:
My suspicion that this started with 1.7.21 is based on Corinna's
comments in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-07/msg00343.html and
other anecdotal evidence of new pr
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
What happens if you replace the single quotes ' with double quotes "?
No doesn't work... :(
Charles Wilson wrote:
What is the result of executing the previous line directly from a bash shell
(with --run-debug=2 --run-nogui)?
$ /usr/bin/run.exe --run-debug=2 --run-
On 7/25/2013 8:11 AM, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
C:\cygwin-2\bin\run.exe bash -l -c 'rm -rf /tmp/{.X*,dbus*,orbit*,*};
XWin -nowgl -multiwindow -clipboard -silent-dup-error 2>/dev/null &'
What is the result of executing the previous line directly from a bash
shell (with --run-debug=2 --run-nogu
On 7/25/2013 4:28 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 24 22:38, Tom Honermann wrote:
My suspicion that this started with 1.7.21 is based on Corinna's
comments in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-07/msg00343.html and
other anecdotal evidence of new problems occurring as of that
release.
This is
On Jul 25 14:11, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> >This is a bugfix update.
>
>
>
> After this update, my Cygwin installation is basically broken. I
> have several links on desktop to start Cygwin applications and they
> don't work any more. The links target sound like these:
>
> C:\cygwin-2\bin\run.
This is a bugfix update.
After this update, my Cygwin installation is basically broken. I have
several links on desktop to start Cygwin applications and they don't
work any more. The links target sound like these:
C:\cygwin-2\bin\run.exe bash -l -c 'rm -rf /tmp/{.X*,dbus*,orbit*,*};
XWi
On 7/25/2013 18:18, JonY wrote:
> On 7/25/2013 17:17, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jul 25 01:36, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>>> On 7/25/2013 12:11 AM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
On 7/24/2013 11:55 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> Does that help at all? I only started seeing this problem after
On 7/25/2013 17:17, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 25 01:36, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>> On 7/25/2013 12:11 AM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>>> On 7/24/2013 11:55 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
Does that help at all? I only started seeing this problem after I
recompiled
_wp.dll using
On Jul 25 01:36, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> On 7/25/2013 12:11 AM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> > On 7/24/2013 11:55 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> >> Does that help at all? I only started seeing this problem after I
> >> recompiled
> >> _wp.dll using gcc 4.7.3.
> >
> > Actually, this problem look
On 7/25/2013 12:11 AM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> On 7/24/2013 11:55 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>> Does that help at all? I only started seeing this problem after I recompiled
>> _wp.dll using gcc 4.7.3.
>
> Actually, this problem looks a lot like
> http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc@gcc.gnu.org/m
On Jul 24 22:38, Tom Honermann wrote:
> It seems that process command lines for Cygwin processes are no
> longer viewable in Windows task manager, SysInternals Process
> Explorer, or other similar tools. I suspect, but have not verified,
> that this change occurred with the Cygwin 1.7.21 release.
On 7/24/2013 11:55 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> Does that help at all? I only started seeing this problem after I recompiled
> _wp.dll using gcc 4.7.3.
Actually, this problem looks a lot like
http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc@gcc.gnu.org/msg68316.html: neither Python nor
_wp links dynamically to
46 matches
Mail list logo
