On 5/17/2013 9:07 AM, David Balažic wrote:
The same thing happened on another PC, so I guess this is some bug int
he postinstall scripts.
Known issue.
See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-05/msg00211.html
--
Chuck
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
On 17/05/2013 5:28 PM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
So it sounds like we may have a feline inavailability deadlock.
Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK?
I think it's ENOPURR .
ROFLMAO.
Maybe ENOMEW would be better.
ENOFUR.
--
Problem reports: ht
On 5/17/2013 12:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK?
It depends. ENOFEL is the BSD way, but POSIX standardized the SysV
error constant, EFLOCK. Linux supports both, of course, so Cygwin
should, too.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>
>>> So it sounds like we may have a feline inavailability deadlock.
>>
>>Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK?
>
> I think it's ENOPURR .
ROFLMAO.
Maybe ENOMEW would be better.
--
Earnie
-- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd
--
Problem r
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 08:00:22PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On May 17 13:48, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:22:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >On May 17 10:56, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
On May 17 13:48, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:22:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On May 17 10:56, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >On May 17 12:56, Fedin Pavel wrote:
> >> >> Hello!
> >> >>
> >
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:22:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On May 17 10:56, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >On May 17 12:56, Fedin Pavel wrote:
>> >> Hello!
>> >>
>> >> > The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a
On 5/17/2013 9:59 AM, David Griffiths wrote:
Gary Johnson spocom.com> writes:
This is not a bug. See Yaakov's announcement in the list on May 12,
"[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.3.943-1". He explains that the
packaging scheme has been changed and that /usr/bin/vi is now Vim
compiled with the
On 17/05/2013 11:22 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On May 17 10:56, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On May 17 12:56, Fedin Pavel wrote:
Hello!
The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a couple of times on
this list. See htt
On May 17 10:56, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On May 17 12:56, Fedin Pavel wrote:
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> > The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a couple of times on
> >> > this list. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/20
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On May 17 12:56, Fedin Pavel wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> > The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a couple of times on
>> > this list. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00173.html,
>> > for instance.
>>
>> Heh...
Gary Johnson spocom.com> writes:
> This is not a bug. See Yaakov's announcement in the list on May 12,
> "[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.3.943-1". He explains that the
> packaging scheme has been changed and that /usr/bin/vi is now Vim
> compiled with the "small" feature set. The "small" featur
On 17 May 2013 14:10, David Balažic wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If I start Setup.exe v2.774 on a PC where cygwin is already installed
> and I select to install new package (not yet installed), then the
> Pending view only shows this selected package and misses all the other
> pending packages (they would be u
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Angelo Graziosi writes:
> If someone is interested I can sent the
> config.log-success-gnutls-devel-3.1.11-1
> config.log-fail-gnutls-devel-3.2.0-1
> as archive config.logs.tar.xz (38K)
Yes please do.
Attached! (it is 32K, I hope it isn't too much..)
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-05/
This page displays non ASCII characters wrongly.
Namely the 'ž' in my last name.
Also when showing the message content:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-05/msg00239.html
Regards,
David
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
Hi!
If I start Setup.exe v2.774 on a PC where cygwin is already installed
and I select to install new package (not yet installed), then the
Pending view only shows this selected package and misses all the other
pending packages (they would be upgraded as a newer version is
available).
Without se
Oh, only after the install wizard is closed it the log file updated.
Now it says:
2013/05/17 14:49:57 running: C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe --norc --noprofile
"/etc/postinstall/update-info-dir.sh"
2013/05/17 14:50:00 running: cmd.exe /c
"C:\cygwin\etc\postinstall\autorebase.bat"
/usr/lib/perl5/5.14/i68
Hi!
I started the latest setup.exe (version 2.774), clicked Next,Next,Next
(aka "update my cygwin installation", a less clicking way would be
welcome) and at the end it printed:
Package: cygutils
cygutils.sh exit code 127
/var/log/setup.log.full has this at the end:
Installing file cygfile:
> Angelo Graziosi writes:
> If someone is interested I can sent the
> config.log-success-gnutls-devel-3.1.11-1
> config.log-fail-gnutls-devel-3.2.0-1
> as archive config.logs.tar.xz (38K)
Yes please do.
> Ciao,
> Angelo.
Ciao
Volker
--
Problem reports:
Usually I do weekly builds of Emacs trunk but this morning the build
failed in configuring
[...]
checking X11/xpm.h usability... yes
checking X11/xpm.h presence... yes
checking for X11/xpm.h... yes
checking for XpmReadFileToPixmap in -lXpm... no
checking jerror.h usability... yes
checking jerror
Hello!
> I'm sure you didn't specify the .cygport suffix:
>
> $ cygport make.cygport prep
>
> This is required for the new style cygport files.
Thanks, i will know.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:
Hi
A new version of 'squid' has been uploaded to a server near you.
o Update to latest upstream
o First cygwin 1.7.x version (Last version was 2.6.STABLE17 from November 2007)
o Build for cygwin 1.7.18 with gcc-4.5.3
o Uses cygport for .hint files generation
o debuginfo package included
sq
On May 17 12:56, Fedin Pavel wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a couple of times on
> > this list. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00173.html,
> > for instance.
>
> Heh...
> So, complete emulation would cost a major performance drop, right ?
>
On May 17 14:06, Fedin Pavel wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > You need a 64-bit Cygwin install to run it in. Well, actually just the
> > 64-bit cygwin1.dll in case of "Hello World". Unfortunately you don't
> > get an error message in case of a missing DLL.
> >
> > ftp://cygwin.com/pub/cygwin/64bit/setup64.
Hello!
> You need a 64-bit Cygwin install to run it in. Well, actually just the
> 64-bit cygwin1.dll in case of "Hello World". Unfortunately you don't
> get an error message in case of a missing DLL.
>
> ftp://cygwin.com/pub/cygwin/64bit/setup64.exe
>
> (Warning: this is still very much in beta
Hello!
> Running makewhatis as shown only produces an empty remnant file
> 'whatis'
> in folders flagging FIND errors.
> What can I do ?
> Tom Axehult
Looks like you don't have findutils installed. In this case attempt to run
'find' command will run find.exe from your Windows installation, whic
Running makewhatis as shown only produces an empty remnant file 'whatis'
in folders flagging FIND errors.
What can I do ?
Tom Axehult
15:58:42 ~ > /usr/sbin/makewhatis -v -w -c &
[2] 7540
04:27:16 ~ > about to enter /usr/local/man
FIND: Invalid switch
FIND: Invalid switch
FIND: Invalid switch
FI
Hello!
> The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a couple of times on
> this list. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00173.html,
> for instance.
Heh...
So, complete emulation would cost a major performance drop, right ?
Well... Can there be any setting which enables these c
2013/5/17 Gary Johnson wrote:
> This is not a bug. See Yaakov's announcement in the list on May 12,
> "[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.3.943-1". He explains that the
> packaging scheme has been changed and that /usr/bin/vi is now Vim
> compiled with the "small" feature set. The "small" feature set
On May 17 10:05, Fedin Pavel wrote:
> Hello! I have found a bug in Cygwin. It exists at least for several months.
> I have updated today but it is still there.
> The bug is simple to trigger and verify. Make a directory like:
>
> mkdir /tmp/test
>
> Then go to /tmp and execute:
>
> ls -l /tmp
On 17 May 2013 08:07, Fedin Pavel wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have noticed that Cygwin64 toolchain is available and installed it. Then
> i tried to compile a simple "Hello world" using it. A 64-bit .exe file was
> created. I am even able to start this file from terminal, but it prints
> nothing. What's
Hello!
I have noticed that Cygwin64 toolchain is available and installed it. Then
i tried to compile a simple "Hello world" using it. A 64-bit .exe file was
created. I am even able to start this file from terminal, but it prints
nothing. What's wrong ?
Kind regards.
--
Problem reports:
On 2013-05-16, Kenneth Salerno wrote:
> Where: vim-7.3.943-1
>
> Issue: vim-common-7.3.943-1 contains
> /usr/share/vim/vim73/colors/elflord.vim which utilizes the command
> "let g:colors_name = "elflord", this command is not found in
> /usr/bin/vim-nox from package vim-7.3.943-1
>
> Fix: downgrad
33 matches
Mail list logo
