On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:52 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
> a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
>
> http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>
> Please reports variations from 1.7.9, including "Hey! It'
On 1/20/2012 12:45 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
Hi list,
I just updated my Cygwin installation for the first time since Oct 26 last
year, and now I'm unable to successfully run cygport builds any more. The
builds fail because of the spontaneous exiting of one or other of the scripts
that cygpo
On 20/01/2012 04:07, Ilguiz Latypov wrote:
> I found that gcc-4 from a recent setup.exe could not start cc1 because the
> latter could not find some shared object file.
>
> I confirmed that by running cc1 alone with an empty PATH variable.
Running "cygcheck /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.3/cc1
I found that gcc-4 from a recent setup.exe could not start cc1 because the
latter could not find some shared object file.
I confirmed that by running cc1 alone with an empty PATH variable.
> $ ( export PATH= ; /cygdrive/c/cygwin/bin/gcc-4.exe -v -E - < /dev/null )
> Using built-in specs.
> COL
Hi list,
I just updated my Cygwin installation for the first time since Oct 26 last
year, and now I'm unable to successfully run cygport builds any more. The
builds fail because of the spontaneous exiting of one or other of the scripts
that cygport invokes - I've had autoconf-2.68 spontane
On 19 January 2012 14:52, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
> a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
>
> http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>
> Please reports variations from 1.7.9, including "Hey! It's a lot fas
Op 19-1-2012 20:52, Christopher Faylor schreef:
Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Please reports variations from 1.7.9, including "Hey! It's a lot faster
than 1.
Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Please reports variations from 1.7.9, including "Hey! It's a lot faster
than 1.7.9!" as well as the usual bug reports.
When repor
On 19/01/2012 10:50 AM, bob 295 wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:29:41AM -0500, bob 295 wrote:
Last spring we tried to port our SIMPL project code to Cygwin but fell
acropper of the known fifo issues in Cygwin.We haven't been able to find
expertise to contribute to a rewrite of the fifo fun
>On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:29:41AM -0500, bob 295 wrote:
>>Last spring we tried to port our SIMPL project code to Cygwin but fell
>>acropper of the known fifo issues in Cygwin.We haven't been able to find
>>expertise to contribute to a rewrite of the fifo functionality.
>Who's "we"?
>>I woul
On 18/01/2012 19:49, Ashlar wrote:
> I have cygwin installed with a number of directories named following this
> format:
>
> C:/Documents\040and\040Settings/Administrator/_web/crhub /webroot ntfs
> binary,posix=0 0 0
>
> When I use the Mount command it includes the assignment for the line
>
> Wh
11 matches
Mail list logo