Re: 64bit (g)fortran JNI

2011-04-12 Thread Jerry DeLisle
On 04/12/2011 07:38 AM, Hans Horn wrote: Folks, has anybody got any experience interfacing (g)fortran routines with Java via JNI? I'm on 64bit Windows7 using cygwin x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc and x86_64-w64-mingw32-gfortran, both v4.5.2 Java: jdk-6u24-windows-x64 Even though I can statically lin

Re: latest emacs, cygwin, and constant stackdumps

2011-04-12 Thread Ken Brown
On 4/12/2011 9:02 PM, Dan Tsafrir wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 18:24, Ken Brown wrote: Another thought: Have you tried rebaseall?. rebaseall indeed eliminated the problem for me. Thanks! Thanks for the feedback. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: latest emacs, cygwin, and constant stackdumps

2011-04-12 Thread Dan Tsafrir
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 18:24, Ken Brown wrote: > On 3/29/2011 9:26 AM, Ken Brown wrote: >> >> On 3/29/2011 8:48 AM, J. David Boyd wrote: >>> >>> I'm not certain of the exact version of these, but they are the latest, >>> as I upgrade at least once a week. >>> >>> Lately, everytime I do almost any

Re: Syntax error in setfacl man page

2011-04-12 Thread Fran
I wrote: > Sometime in the last few months, setfacl stopped accepting two colons (::) > after the keyword "other", as in this example: > > $ setfacl -s user::rw-,group::r--,other::r-- filename > setfacl: illegal acl entries > > But the setfacl(1) man page continues to show the invalid syntax

Syntax error in setfacl man page

2011-04-12 Thread Fran
Sometime in the last few months, setfacl stopped accepting two colons (::) after the keyword "other", as in this example: $ setfacl -s user::rw-,group::r--,other::r-- filename setfacl: illegal acl entries But the setfacl(1) man page continues to show the invalid syntax: o[ther]::perm The

Re: 1.7.9-1: typeahead queue not flushed when Ctrl+C pressed

2011-04-12 Thread Edward McGuire
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 13:39, Edward McGuire wrote: > The trouble I am having is that my keyboard input is preserved > when I press Ctrl+C. As there was no response of any kind, I am just checking whether I committed some error in posting this. Could someone most kindly reply privately to let me

Re: Windows7 STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION and gcc/g++ linking problems

2011-04-12 Thread Tomas Staig
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 13:44 -0400, Tomas Staig wrote: First I'll state that this is most probably not BLODA (unless some default program that comes with W7 provokes it), FWIW, Windows Defender is a default component of recent versions of Windows, including Win7

Re: 64bit (g)fortran JNI

2011-04-12 Thread Eliot Moss
On 4/12/2011 11:10 AM, Hans Horn wrote: On 4/12/2011 8:02 AM, Eliot Moss wrote: For x64 Windows releated target questions it would be better if you are posting to mingw-w64's ML: I redirect this thread to this list. Elliot, [Eliot] I've been using the cygwin gcc compiler (with the -mno-c

Re: 64bit (g)fortran JNI

2011-04-12 Thread Hans Horn
On 4/12/2011 7:48 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: 2011/4/12 Hans Horn: Folks, has anybody got any experience interfacing (g)fortran routines with Java via JNI? I'm on 64bit Windows7 using cygwin x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc and x86_64-w64-mingw32-gfortran, both v4.5.2 Java: jdk-6u24-windows-x64 Even though I

Re: 64bit (g)fortran JNI

2011-04-12 Thread Hans Horn
On 4/12/2011 8:02 AM, Eliot Moss wrote: For x64 Windows releated target questions it would be better if you are posting to mingw-w64's ML: I redirect this thread to this list. Yes, definitely: - cygwin is for 32-bit only - cygwin is not really compatible with even a 32-bit JVM if you were thin

Re: 64bit (g)fortran JNI

2011-04-12 Thread Eliot Moss
For x64 Windows releated target questions it would be better if you are posting to mingw-w64's ML: I redirect this thread to this list. Yes, definitely: - cygwin is for 32-bit only - cygwin is not really compatible with even a 32-bit JVM if you were thinking of using cygwin to run JNI code.

Re: 64bit (g)fortran JNI

2011-04-12 Thread Kai Tietz
2011/4/12 Hans Horn : > Folks, > > has anybody got any experience interfacing (g)fortran routines with Java via > JNI? > > I'm on 64bit Windows7 using cygwin > x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc and x86_64-w64-mingw32-gfortran, both v4.5.2 > > Java: jdk-6u24-windows-x64 > > Even though I can statically link th

Re: Windows tools can access /usr/share but not /usr/lib

2011-04-12 Thread Marc Girod
Jon TURNEY wrote: > > A brief glance at the man page should discover 'cygpath -w -f-' > Indeed... Sorry for missing this... Reini Urban wrote: > > $ perldoc perlcygwin > and Thanks for that which is exactly what I needed! And which I had missed as well! Marc -- View this message in context:

64bit (g)fortran JNI

2011-04-12 Thread Hans Horn
Folks, has anybody got any experience interfacing (g)fortran routines with Java via JNI? I'm on 64bit Windows7 using cygwin x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc and x86_64-w64-mingw32-gfortran, both v4.5.2 Java: jdk-6u24-windows-x64 Even though I can statically link the JNI code successfully (using gfort

Re: Windows tools can access /usr/share but not /usr/lib

2011-04-12 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 12/04/2011 13:36, Reini Urban wrote: > 2011/4/11 Marc Girod: >> Andy Koppe wrote: >>> You should use the cygpath utility to translate Cygwin paths to >>> Windows paths, rather than just changing slashes and prefixing with >>> C:\cygwin. >> OK. Done. >> Now, my script will fork this for every arg

Re: Windows tools can access /usr/share but not /usr/lib

2011-04-12 Thread Reini Urban
2011/4/11 Marc Girod: > Andy Koppe wrote: >> You should use the cygpath utility to translate Cygwin paths to >> Windows paths, rather than just changing slashes and prefixing with >> C:\cygwin. > OK. Done. > Now, my script will fork this for every argument... > Can I spawn a 'cygpath -w', put it in