Re: Bug report for run.exe with patch

2011-01-20 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 1/20/2011 8:04 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote: This is a bug in a program that is installed and used in pretty much every single Cygwin installation in the world. Other people have reported encountering the bug. I've identified the bug and provided a patch, three weeks ago. Can I please get some

RE: Bug report for run.exe with patch

2011-01-20 Thread Jonathan Kamens
This is a bug in a program that is installed and used in pretty much every single Cygwin installation in the world. Other people have reported encountering the bug. I've identified the bug and provided a patch, three weeks ago. Can I please get someone in a position to release the fix to acknowl

Re: Invoking GUI programs over SSH

2011-01-20 Thread David Antliff
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 08:59, Eric Blake wrote: > On 01/20/2011 12:47 PM, David Antliff wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 20:06, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >>> * David Antliff (Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:31:25 +1300) Actually there is one outstanding issue with this "Hudson slaves over SSH" issue -

Re: Invoking GUI programs over SSH

2011-01-20 Thread Eric Blake
On 01/20/2011 12:47 PM, David Antliff wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 20:06, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >> * David Antliff (Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:31:25 +1300) >>> Actually there is one outstanding issue with this "Hudson slaves over >>> SSH" issue - due to the inability for Cygwin's bash to run scripts >

Re: Invoking GUI programs over SSH

2011-01-20 Thread David Antliff
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 20:06, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > * David Antliff (Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:31:25 +1300) >> Actually there is one outstanding issue with this "Hudson slaves over >> SSH" issue - due to the inability for Cygwin's bash to run scripts >> with DOS line endings, we've had to use SHELLOPT

RE: No manual entry for awk

2011-01-20 Thread Bill Ross
> Just a heads-up: I expect that few, if any, people on this list find your > observation interesting, and fewer, if any, will think it an issue. (Or > is it the other way around?) Since you do, I'd suggest that you consider > looking over the documentation; doing so may save you a lot of >"int

Re: No manual entry for awk

2011-01-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 20 13:58, Chris Velevitch wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:29, Reid Thompson wrote: > > try > > $ man gawk > > Interesting. awk is linked to gawk. That means there is an issue with > the man pages [...] gawk is built from the vanilla upstream sources. I agree that it's kind of weird t