Hi,
I need to revise my problem report some weeks ago. Actually, the "Changing
Cygwin's Maximum Memory" explanations under
http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/setup-maxmem.htm recommending
something like
regtool -i set /HKLM/Software/Cygwin/heap_chunk_in_mb 2048
regtool -v list /HKLM/Softwar
Hi,
I've been trying to get an application running which calls shmget -
despite running cygserver until now its always crashed with "Bad system
call". I stumbled upon the solution of copying the binary into /bin and
for some reason it works. Can anyone tell me what's special about /bin
that causes
mintty 0.9.4-1 is on its way to the Cygwin mirrors. This is a
maintenance release.
CHANGES
===
- Reinstated flow control with ^S and ^Q, following protests. Hence
the stty command to enable it in 0.9.3 is no longer needed. The 'stty
-ixon' command can be used to disable flow control again and
This is the FULL error:
error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1
make[1]: *** [pymod-build-stamp] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/cygdrive/c/MOBILE/SDK/pocketsphinx/base/sphinxbase-
0.6.1/python'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
Do I need to configure cygwin with a path to python he
Hi,
I've been trying to rebuild cygwin from the 20101215 snapshot but
can't get past the error "couldn't find i686-pc-mingw32 directory". I'm
using gcc 4.3.4 20090804 on Windows 7 x64. To build it, I did the
following:
tar xjf cygwwin-snapshot-20101215.tar.bz2
cd cygwin-snapshot-20101215 && mkdir
I see already see python.h in that location, is that all I need?
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>
> On 12/17/2010 12:20 AM, mike6679 wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to compile pocketsphinx using cygwin and i get an error. From
>> what
>> I researched, it seems I need the python development header or
>> "
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 21:07, Robert S. Heckel Jr. wrote:
> Will let you know if I find anything. Anyone else experience 0.5.2-1 crashes?
Since I haven't heard of problems from other people (yet at least) and
I can't replicate the crash, you may want to try either a reinstall
of:
w3m libgc1 li
On Dec 17 19:41, Andy Koppe wrote:
> 2010/12/17 Vincent Côté-Roy:
> > I'm sorry, I wasn't very clear: xyz.bat or xyz.cmd do indeed execute
> > as before. My problem is that when I type xyz (i.e. without the
> > extension) it won't find xyz.bat or xyz.cmd, as it did before
> > upgrading.
>
> It di
8 matches
Mail list logo
