On 10/31/2010 1:46 PM, Nigel Hardy wrote:
Thank you Eliot for the mail attachment suggestion. I attach the output
here.
Thank you Ken for the "cygcheck /usr/bin/emacs-X11.exe" suggestion - the
output seems good to me and is attached. Starting from mintty did not work.
bash-3.2$ echo $DISPLA
> On 31 October 2010 17:12, Brian Wilson wrote:
> > In my case the context was that suddenly ssh stopped working and would only
> > give the usage message no matter what I tried. I ran the "cygcheck -svr"
and
> > noted that I did not have the latest Cygwin (1.7.7) installed even though
> > runni
On 31 October 2010 17:39, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 31 October 2010 17:12, Brian Wilson wrote:
>> In my case the context was that suddenly ssh stopped working and would only
>> give the usage message no matter what I tried. I ran the "cygcheck -svr" and
>> noted that I did not have the latest Cygwin
On 31 October 2010 17:12, Brian Wilson wrote:
> In my case the context was that suddenly ssh stopped working and would only
> give the usage message no matter what I tried. I ran the "cygcheck -svr" and
> noted that I did not have the latest Cygwin (1.7.7) installed even though
> running setup sai
On 31 October 2010 17:02, James Broadhead wrote:
> On 31 October 2010 16:51, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> On 31 October 2010 16:45, James Broadhead wrote:
>>> I also have this problem;
>>
>> Context?
>
> The 10 or so messages in the archive with the same subject line.
Might have been a good idea then to r
> On 31 October 2010 16:45, James Broadhead wrote:
> > I also have this problem;
>
> Context?
>
> >>> ssh ja...@192.168.1.15
> > usage: ssh [-1246AaCfgKkMNnqsTtVvXxYy] [-b bind_address] [-c cipher_spec]
> > [-D [bind_address:]port] [-e escape_char] [-F configfile]
> > [-I pk
On 31 October 2010 16:51, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 31 October 2010 16:45, James Broadhead wrote:
>> I also have this problem;
>
> Context?
The 10 or so messages in the archive with the same subject line.
On 31 October 2010 13:28, Brian Wilson wrote:
> Looks like the "gummed up" diagnosis was the
On 31 October 2010 16:45, James Broadhead wrote:
> I also have this problem;
Context?
>>> ssh ja...@192.168.1.15
> usage: ssh [-1246AaCfgKkMNnqsTtVvXxYy] [-b bind_address] [-c cipher_spec]
> [-D [bind_address:]port] [-e escape_char] [-F configfile]
> [-I pkcs11] [-i identity_f
I also have this problem;
>> ssh ja...@192.168.1.15
usage: ssh [-1246AaCfgKkMNnqsTtVvXxYy] [-b bind_address] [-c cipher_spec]
[-D [bind_address:]port] [-e escape_char] [-F configfile]
[-I pkcs11] [-i identity_file]
[-L [bind_address:]port:host:hostport]
[-l
On 31 October 2010 14:39, David wrote:
> By adding #include it worked.
>
> Den 31-10-2010 14:45, Tim Prince skrev:
>>
>> On 10/31/2010 6:21 AM, David wrote:
>>>
>>> Does Cygwin c compiler not support c99?
>>> or does c99 not support?:
>>>
>>> #include
>>> #include
>
> #include
>>>
>>> int main(
By adding #include it worked.
Den 31-10-2010 14:45, Tim Prince skrev:
On 10/31/2010 6:21 AM, David wrote:
Does Cygwin c compiler not support c99?
or does c99 not support?:
#include
#include
#include
int main(void) {
bool f=true;
for(int i=0; i<10; i++) {
if (f)
printf("%d\n",i);
}
puts
Your result is right but I get
$ gcc -O -Wall -pedantic -std=c99 testC.c
testC.c: In function 'main':
testC.c:15: error: 'bool' undeclared (first use in this function)
testC.c:15: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
testC.c:15: error: for each function it appears in.)
testC.c
On 10/31/2010 6:21 AM, David wrote:
Does Cygwin c compiler not support c99?
or does c99 not support?:
#include
#include
int main(void) {
bool f=true;
for(int i=0; i<10; i++) {
if (f)
printf("%d\n",i);
}
puts("Hello World!!!"); /* prints Hello World!!! */
r
Does Cygwin c compiler not support c99?
or does c99 not support?:
#include
#include
int main(void) {
bool f=true;
for(int i=0; i<10; i++) {
if (f)
printf("%d\n",i);
}
puts("Hello World!!!"); /* prints Hello World!!! */
re
>
> No, if it's reporting 1.7.1, I expect that's the version you're running.
> And I expect that's coming into play here. But go ahead and double check
> it in the Windows explorer. I expect you'll find it reports 1.7.1 too.
>
> This is a problem. I expect you know that you need to stop all
In my first e-mail I failed to attached the Xwin log and the cygcheck output. I have just tried that
and 209.132.180.131 bounced it as spam.
How should I make those available?
Nigel
The log files have an email address in them.
Look for the @ character. Delete the email
or rewrite it to read "
On 10/31/2010 6:00 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
--- Dom 31/10/10, Nigel Hardy ha scritto:
When I try to start my new emacs
under X from bash, I get complete silence. This happens with
"emacs" and directly with "emacs-X11.exe".
"emacs-nox.exe" starts up fine.
I have just upgraded to emacs 23.2-3 (f
In my first e-mail I failed to attached the Xwin log and the cygcheck
output. I have just tried that and 209.132.180.131 bounced it as spam.
How should I make those available?
Nigel
Marco Atzeri wrote:
--- Dom 31/10/10, Nigel Hardy ha scritto:
When I try to start my new emacs
under X fr
--- Dom 31/10/10, Nigel Hardy ha scritto:
> When I try to start my new emacs
> under X from bash, I get complete silence. This happens with
> "emacs" and directly with "emacs-X11.exe".
> "emacs-nox.exe" starts up fine.
>
> I have just upgraded to emacs 23.2-3 (from, I believe a 22
> version - I
When I try to start my new emacs under X from bash, I get complete
silence. This happens with "emacs" and directly with "emacs-X11.exe".
"emacs-nox.exe" starts up fine.
I have just upgraded to emacs 23.2-3 (from, I believe a 22 version - I
have no record of what was replaced).
I am running cy
20 matches
Mail list logo
