Re: How do you enable the conceal feature?

On 2010-07-23, Gary Johnson wrote: > I just updated to the latest Vim 7.3 changeset on my Linux system > and after building it noticed that the conceal feature wasn't > included. I tried to enable it using > > ./configure --enable-cscope --enable-conceal > > but got this warning: > > co

How do you enable the conceal feature?

I just updated to the latest Vim 7.3 changeset on my Linux system and after building it noticed that the conceal feature wasn't included. I tried to enable it using ./configure --enable-cscope --enable-conceal but got this warning: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-conc

Re: section 2 man pages

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 03:05:17PM -0500, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: >> From: Eric Blake >> On 07/23/2010 07:19 AM, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: >> > Are section 2 man pages available? >> >> Not at the moment. Volunteers welcome to help provide them. >> Meanwhile, >> I find that the POSIX specification is

Re: Tab completion is obscenely slow

On 07/23/2010 02:50 PM, John Cromartie wrote: When I type /cyg or /cygdrive/c/Prog or try similar completions, the shell can hang for a good 30-40 seconds. I don't have any network drives on my path. What's could be causing this? Use 'set -vx' before typing '/cyg', so that you can see the fu

Tab completion is obscenely slow

When I type /cyg or /cygdrive/c/Prog or try similar completions, the shell can hang for a good 30-40 seconds. I don't have any network drives on my path. What's could be causing this? -John -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Doc

RE: section 2 man pages

> From: Eric Blake > On 07/23/2010 07:19 AM, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: > > Are section 2 man pages available? > > Not at the moment. Volunteers welcome to help provide them. > Meanwhile, > I find that the POSIX specification is good enough (at least, for using > interfaces portably): > http://www.op

Re: Emacs keeps hanging in setjmp

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:13:38PM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote: >At seemingly random times, Emacs hangs hard and has to be killed. This is >the stack trace. Does anyone have any idea what could be wrong? > >(gdb) where >#0 0x77c3fee1 in ntdll!RtlEnableEarlyCriticalSectionEventCreation () > fr

Re: Standardizing a Cygwin installation across machines?

On 7/23/2010 2:21 PM, John Cromartie wrote: > Hi list, > > I make heavy use of cygwin across multiple servers. It is used for build > process automation and many other tasks. I would like to have a simple > standard installation I can "roll out" to new systems, or even to just > normalize exist

Retrieve fails with apparently bad path

Correction (See below) Selected "All" to "download only" About 31% of the way through, a dialog box with the following popped up: Can't open C:\users\clark\Public\PC-SystemStuff\cygwin-1.7.5_2010.07.23\cygwin-1.7. 5_2010.07.23_Download\http%3a%2f%2fmirrors.kernel.org%2fsourceware%2fcyg win%2f\re

Retrieve fails with apparently bad path

Selected "All" to "download only" About 31% of the way through, a dialog box with the following popped up: Can't open C:\users\clark\Public\PC-SystemStuff\cygwin-1.7.5_2010.07.23\cygwin-1.7. 5_2010.07.23_Download\http%3a%2f%2fmirrors.kernel.org%2fsourceware%2fcyg win%2f\release\GNOME\gobject-intr

Standardizing a Cygwin installation across machines?

Hi list, I make heavy use of cygwin across multiple servers. It is used for build process automation and many other tasks. I would like to have a simple standard installation I can "roll out" to new systems, or even to just normalize existing systems. For example: I discover I need a new packag

Emacs keeps hanging in setjmp

At seemingly random times, Emacs hangs hard and has to be killed. This is the stack trace. Does anyone have any idea what could be wrong? (gdb) where #0 0x77c3fee1 in ntdll!RtlEnableEarlyCriticalSectionEventCreation () from /c/Windows/SysWOW64/ntdll.dll #1 0x77c3fee1 in ntdll!RtlEnableEarlyCr

Re: regtool -R?

> > > > It would be great to have a recursive (-R) option for regtool list. > > > > Andrew. > > > > > > I don't like working on regtool or the registry in general at all. > > > Maybe you would like to create a patch yourself? > > > > Understood. I'll put it on the old to-do list. > > Andrew. >

Re: git and openssh issue (eblake?)

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:04:39AM -0500, Jeremy Bopp wrote: >On 7/22/2010 8:19 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: >> On 7/22/2010 6:44 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote: >> >> It is not that unreproducible... It fails maybe 5 out of 6 tries. If >> you can get it to work 10 out of 10 times then I would say you don't >>

Re: git and openssh issue

On 7/22/2010 8:19 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: > On 7/22/2010 6:44 PM, Jeremy Bopp wrote: > > It is not that unreproducible... It fails maybe 5 out of 6 tries. If > you can get it to work 10 out of 10 times then I would say you don't > have the problem. I'm actually able to reproduce this early EOF e

Re: regtool -R?

On Jul 23 10:00, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > On Jul 20 13:25, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > > It would be great to have a recursive (-R) option for regtool list. > > > Andrew. > > > > I don't like working on regtool or the registry in general at all. > > Maybe you would like to create a patch yourself

Re: regtool -R?

> On Jul 20 13:25, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > It would be great to have a recursive (-R) option for regtool list. > > Andrew. > > I don't like working on regtool or the registry in general at all. > Maybe you would like to create a patch yourself? Understood. I'll put it on the old to-do list. A

Re: When will the next gcc come out

On 23/07/2010 10:02, Huang Bambo wrote: > > Gcc optimized out some code like > *fp++ = *format_string ++; > > When I gdb to that line and "print fp", gdb reported that fp is optized out... You need to check in more detail than that. GCC may have optimised away the fp variable, but kept the f

Re: When will the next gcc come out

On 23/07/2010 09:24, Huang Bambo wrote: > The current gcc( 4.3.4 ) has some bug with O3 option. it will > optimized out some needed code in some case. > I meet this bug when I compile ACE library. > If I use O2 option, everything goes fine. > So, maybe many people may waiting for the new version. :

Re: section 2 man pages

On 07/23/2010 07:19 AM, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: > Are section 2 man pages available? Not at the moment. Volunteers welcome to help provide them. Meanwhile, I find that the POSIX specification is good enough (at least, for using interfaces portably): http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/

Re: UK mirror

On 7/23/2010 4:11 AM, Alex Morris wrote: Hello Larry, Thank you for letting me know. It is my bad luck I suppose that I didn't get any response from sourcemaster, positive or negative. It can be a delayed response and could just end up being that the mirror shows up here

section 2 man pages

Are section 2 man pages available? $ man 2 write No entry for write in section 2 of the manual $ man write No manual entry for write $ I searched the online package library and perused Setup to no avail. --Ken Nellis

RE: Cygwin command line takes a long time to start

> From: Andy Koppe > On 23 July 2010 02:53, David Antliff wrote: > >> OK then the easiest thing to do is add "set -x" to your > ~/.bash_profile > >> and watch where the delay happens as the statements scroll by. > > > > Ah, that's useful - I also have a 10-second-or-so delay when mintty > > starts.

Re: cygwin-specific gcc question

On 07/22/2010 06:09 PM, Dave Korn wrote: > On 21/07/2010 22:54, Eric Blake wrote: >> Is there any sane reason that: >> >> gcc -E -dD -o - foo.c >> >> generates ./-.exe on cygwin, rather than outputting to stdout like on >> every other platform? This tripped up an autoconf test. Fortunately, >> re

How to find debug messages from cygwin.dll

For debugging purpose I need own build cygwin.dll. I use snapshot cygwin-src-20100707.tar.bz2 When I go through build process ( as noticed at page http://cygwin.com/faq/faq-nochunks.html#faq.programming.building-cygwin ) some questions arises. 1) I run command 'make check' and following erro

Re: 1.7.5+: Bug in write() handling of 'disk full' condition? (XP)

On Jul 22 17:42, Catalin Patulea wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running a Windows XP SP3 with NTFS drives and woefully little disk > space.. I have ~200MB free on my D:\ drive. When I use write() with a > buffer larger than my available disk space, the return value is bogus > and sometimes larger than the b

Re: When will the next gcc come out

2010/7/23 Andy Koppe : > On 23 July 2010 09:24, Huang Bambo wrote: >> The current gcc( 4.3.4 ) has some bug with O3 option. it will >> optimized out some needed code in some case. >> I meet this bug when I compile ACE library. >> If I use O2 option, everything goes fine. > > Have you got any actual

Re: Difficulty setting up domain SSH daemon under Domain Security Policies

On Jul 22 17:28, Hunter, Bryan wrote: > Here are the results. > administra...@detfs01 ~ > $ ssh-host-config -y -c "tty ntsec" -u "TRADE\sshd_server_domain" > --privileged > [...] > *** Warning: Creating the user 'TRADE\sshd_server_domain' failed! > Reason: > The syntax of this command is: > > > N

Re: When will the next gcc come out

On 23 July 2010 09:24, Huang Bambo wrote: > The current gcc( 4.3.4 ) has some bug with O3 option. it will > optimized out some needed code in some case. > I meet this bug when I compile ACE library. > If I use O2 option, everything goes fine. Have you got any actual evidence for this being a bug i

When will the next gcc come out

The current gcc( 4.3.4 ) has some bug with O3 option. it will optimized out some needed code in some case. I meet this bug when I compile ACE library. If I use O2 option, everything goes fine. So, maybe many people may waiting for the new version. :> Thanks ! -- Problem reports: http://cygwi

Re[2]: UK mirror

Hello Larry, Thank you for letting me know. It is my bad luck I suppose that I didn't get any response from sourcemaster, positive or negative. Regards, Alex Morris Thursday, July 22, 2010, 5:55:55 PM, you wrote: > On 7/22/2010 5:59 AM, Alex Morris wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to suggest a