Re: cygdrive prefix

2009-09-18 Thread Linda Walsh
Harald Joerg wrote: > Linda Walsh writes: > >> [...] OTOH, at least the defaults are pretty sensible ... > > Pretty sensible, indeed. I love /cygdrive as just another example of a > pretty sensible default. --- Well, MS, put their unix in /unix. Wouldn't it make sense to put a cygwin su

[ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] updated: atool-0.37.0-1

2009-09-18 Thread Andrew Schulman
A new version of the atool package is now available in the Cygwin 1.7 distribution. Changes in this release: * New upstream release: add lzip and xz support, plus a few other minor features and bug fixes. See http://www.nongnu.org/atool/NEWS for details. About atool: atool is a script for manag

Re: [1.7] sigwait bug (SIGCHLD delayed to a next regular signal)

2009-09-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 04:57:56PM +, Waldemar Rachwal wrote: >A problem seems very close to one described in >http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2009-08/msg00797.html >and now I don't think it can be easily explained by >"limitation in Cygwin's implementation of SIGWINCH". > >What I did this time

incorrect getpagesize() signature

2009-09-18 Thread Andy Koppe
/usr/include/sys/unistd.h: size_t _EXFUN(getpagesize, (void)); POSIX: int getpagesize(void); -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#uns

[1.7] sigwait bug (SIGCHLD delayed to a next regular signal)

2009-09-18 Thread Waldemar Rachwal
A problem seems very close to one described in http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2009-08/msg00797.html and now I don't think it can be easily explained by "limitation in Cygwin's implementation of SIGWINCH". What I did this time... When I fork children and next observe their termination in the pare

RE: Subversion https access

2009-09-18 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com > [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of David Rothenberger > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 11:45 > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: Subversion https access > > > This isn't a problem with the Cygwin svn client, hence

Re: Subversion https access

2009-09-18 Thread David Rothenberger
On 9/18/2009 8:23 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote: -Original Message- From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of David Rothenberger Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 11:08 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Subversion https access On 9/18/2009 7:40 AM, Jason Pyer

RE: Subversion https access

2009-09-18 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com > [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of David Rothenberger > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 11:08 > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: Subversion https access > > On 9/18/2009 7:40 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > I have two mac

Re: Subversion https access

2009-09-18 Thread David Rothenberger
On 9/18/2009 7:40 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote: I have two machines on my desk. One performs fine, the other gets SSL errors while trying to connect. The files under /cygwin on both machines are the same. Attached are both cygchecks. DDCRDR003646 is the working machine. The error: $ svn co https://XX

Re: cygdrive prefix

2009-09-18 Thread Shaddy Baddah
Hi Andy, Andy Koppe wrote: 2009/9/16 Dave Korn: whatever) prefixes when accessing stuff from the other side of the fence. Never mind the fence, what colour are we going to paint the bikeshed? This is purely a matter of taste. Exactly. I didn't mean to suggest that Cygwin sh

Re: gcc-4.3.2(beta) - Invalid conversion to pointer to protected base class

2009-09-18 Thread Dave Korn
Dave Korn wrote: > Paul Bibbings wrote: >> The following code [ ... ] appears to be closely related to (if not >> duplicating) >> GCC Bugzilla Bug 35640 >> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35640). > > Yep, sure looks like it to me. I don't think I'll have time to look at this > be