I'm trying to automate my backup using rsync and cron. I have the ssh key pair
setup, but still requires me manually start s cygwin shell every time I boot
into Windows. Does anyone know of a way to start and agent and prompt for my
passphrase at boot?
Below is what I'm using now and is what I
Hi,
I don't find gnome-terminal in 'setup.exe'. I am wondering if it is
available there or I have to install it manually?
Regards,
Peng
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.c
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> This isn't a Cygwin-specific thing. That's the way Windows works.
> Order is dependent here for the same reason that you can't do:
>
> gcc -Lfoo program-that-uses-foo.o
>
> on Windows.
I'm at least a little bit surprised. My first thought was "Calling
LoadLibrary
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:56:12AM +, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
>--- Sab 30/5/09, Christopher Faylor ha scritto:
>
>> >Ok, I found it.
>> >The order is also relevant
>> >
>> >cygoctinterp.dll requires
>> >???cygcruft.dll and cygoctave.dll
>> >
>> >cygoctave.dll requires
>> >? cygcruft.dll
>> >
On 31/05/2009 11:33, miem...@physik.hu-berlin.de wrote:
Tried to compile xfce 3.8.18.
Why are you trying to build such an ancient Xfce? The current version
is 4.6, which works just fine on Cygwin.
Is a solution to this problem known ?
Probably not, because nobody supports such old versio
Tried to compile xfce 3.8.18.
Compilation and linking were completed successfully.
Half of the programs crashed with a sigsegv.
The problem seems to originate from XInternAtom calls in
the libX11 version 6 library.
Is a solution to this problem known ?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://c
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Roger Head wrote:
> U... e no, no, that's too easy. There must be a harder way to do
> it.
As an alternative you can try looking into my
http://git.kitsu.ru/mine/shell-wrapper.git (use snapshot link for
topmost commit if you don't have git and don't k
Roger Head wrote:
> Dave Korn googlemail.com> writes:
>
>> How about just typing "g++-4" (or "g++-3") instead of "g++" when trying
>> to invoke the compiler from a DOS shell?
>>
>> cheers, DaveK
>>
>
> U... e no, no, that's too easy. There must be a harder way to
> do it.
To par
Dave Korn googlemail.com> writes:
> How about just typing "g++-4" (or "g++-3") instead of "g++" when trying to
> invoke the compiler from a DOS shell?
>
> cheers,
> DaveK
>
U... e no, no, that's too easy. There must be a harder way to do it.
Thanks Dave.
Roger
--
On 5/31/2009 10:15 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 5/31/2009 9:36 AM, Andy Koppe wrote:
Currently the code sends ^H for Alt+Backspace, which clobbers 'kill
word' in emacs, so that still needs to either move to Ctrl+Backspace
or be removed altogether.
Right. I forgot about that. Presumably there's no
On 5/31/2009 9:36 AM, Andy Koppe wrote:
Currently the code sends ^H for Alt+Backspace, which clobbers 'kill
word' in emacs, so that still needs to either move to Ctrl+Backspace
or be removed altogether.
Right. I forgot about that. Presumably there's no linux standard that
says Alt-Backspace
Andy Koppe wrote:
>> I'm sure that I can come up with a hack that will let me do what I want
>
> The easiest thing to do would be to overwrite the link with the file
> it points to, e.g. 'cp /bin/g++-4.exe /bin/g++.exe'. You'd have to
> remember to do that after every gcc update though.
How ab
2009/5/31 Ken Brown:
> As I long-time emacs user, I have to say that I have never been tempted to
> type Ctrl-Backspace in emacs. But, as a result of this discussion, I just
> tried it in three different settings and got three different behaviors.
> (The three settings were: emacs under X, emacs
On 5/31/2009 5:13 AM, Andy Koppe wrote:
2009/5/30 Matt Wozniski:
On Debian, at least, the console sends ^H for Ctrl+Backspace and ^?
for Backspace; that is a pretty common convention among terminal
emulators that I've used. I vote against the ^_ suggestion; I for one
would be genuinely surprised
--- Sab 30/5/09, Christopher Faylor ha scritto:
> >Ok, I found it.
> >The order is also relevant
> >
> >cygoctinterp.dll requires
> > cygcruft.dll and cygoctave.dll
> >
> >cygoctave.dll requires
> > cygcruft.dll
> >
> >So the working way is :
> >
> >export LD_PRELOAD="$libcruft:$liboctave:
Hi Andy,
> > I'm almost certain that I was able to invoke it from a CMD window.
>
> Afaik, gcc and g++ changed into links only recently, to help with the
> transition from gcc-3.4 to 4.3.
>
There are still some remnants of AVR-GCC hanging around on my system from a few
years ago. Maybe a conne
2009/5/30 Ken Brown:
> Now C-h and Backspace work as expected when I run emacs in a Cygwin console,
> provided I do stty erase ^? first. Am I right in assuming that this won't
> be necessary once the termios default is changed?
Yep.
2009/5/30 Matt Wozniski:
> On Debian, at least, the console se
2009/5/31 Roger Head:
> Thanks for the reply, Matt. I don't have a really good idea of how Cygwin and
> Windows are both supposed to be able to handle .LNKs to e.g. G++, but a dump
> of
> g++.exe.lnk shows strings for /etc/alternatives and
> L:\cygwin\etc\alternatives.
> So yes, I don't know if W
Matt Wozniski gmail.com> writes:
>
> Don't have a cygwin install in front of me ATM, but - isn't g++ a
> cygwin symlink these days? cmd.exe can't follow those even if they're
> in the path, of course.
>
> ~Matt
>
Thanks for the reply, Matt. I don't have a really good idea of how Cygwin and
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Larry Hall wrote:
> Roger Head wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm a noob to Cygwin and all things non-Windows. I installed Cygwin on my
>> Win2k system (a couple of hiccups, but nothing major), then installed the
>> GCC. When that completed, I did g++ -v in a bash windo
20 matches
Mail list logo
