On 20 Oct 2008 11:53:19 PDT, "Manning, Sid" wrote:
> Of course I needed an excuse to ask the question, surprised or curious
> either would have sufficed. So the implementation of a GNU/Posix stack
> over windows is expensive and that is understandable (I suffer from cross
> platform headaches all
On 20 Oct 2008 11:53:19 PDT, "Manning, Sid" wrote:
> Of course I needed an excuse to ask the question, surprised or curious
> either would have sufficed. So the implementation of a GNU/Posix stack
> over windows is expensive and that is understandable (I suffer from cross
> platform headaches all
Herb Maeder wrote:
Apologies to the list for getting the same message sent over and over to
the list from my account. I can't yet explain what is happening, but I can
assure you that I only sent the message once (and in no way differently
than my other posts to the list).
When I first saw th
Automake is a tool for automatically generating `Makefile.in' files
compliant with the GNU Coding Standards.
This cygwin package, automake1.5, can be installed without conflict
alongside the existing automake1.10, automake1.9, automake1.8,
automake1.7, automake1.6, and automake1.4 cygwin packages.
Automake is a tool for automatically generating `Makefile.in' files
compliant with the GNU Coding Standards.
This cygwin package, automake1.4, can be installed without conflict
alongside the existing automake1.10, automake1.9, automake1.8,
automake1.7, automake1.6, and automake1.5 cygwin packages.
Apologies to the list for getting the same message sent over and over to
the list from my account. I can't yet explain what is happening, but I can
assure you that I only sent the message once (and in no way differently
than my other posts to the list).
I've been on the phone with my ISP for the
On 20 Oct 2008 11:53:19 PDT, "Manning, Sid" wrote:
> Of course I needed an excuse to ask the question, surprised or curious
> either would have sufficed. So the implementation of a GNU/Posix stack
> over windows is expensive and that is understandable (I suffer from cross
> platform headaches all
On 20 Oct 2008 11:53:19 PDT, "Manning, Sid" wrote:
> Of course I needed an excuse to ask the question, surprised or curious
> either would have sufficed. So the implementation of a GNU/Posix stack
> over windows is expensive and that is understandable (I suffer from cross
> platform headaches all
On 20 Oct 2008 11:53:19 PDT, "Manning, Sid" wrote:
> Of course I needed an excuse to ask the question, surprised or curious
> either would have sufficed. So the implementation of a GNU/Posix stack
> over windows is expensive and that is understandable (I suffer from cross
> platform headaches all
DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Herb Maeder <> wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008 11:53:19 PDT, "Manning, Sid" wrote:
-= lots and lots of things snipped =-
Has anyone else gotten Herb's message 5 times (so far)?
Or is it just me?
This is always the answer to questions like thi
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Herb Maeder <> wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2008 11:53:19 PDT, "Manning, Sid" wrote:
-= lots and lots of things snipped =-
Has anyone else gotten Herb's message 5 times (so far)?
Or is it just me?
-Jason
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
P
On 20 Oct 2008 11:53:19 PDT, "Manning, Sid" wrote:
> Of course I needed an excuse to ask the question, surprised or curious
> either would have sufficed. So the implementation of a GNU/Posix stack
> over windows is expensive and that is understandable (I suffer from cross
> platform headaches all
ProblematicRoutes wrote:
Mark J. Reed wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:34 AM, ProblematicRoutes wrote:
This $ sign causes problems everywhere - with latex, with svn, with
anything
that uses ~ to refer to my home directory, because it expands to ...$/...
and bash tries to parse the $/ a
On 20 Oct 2008 11:53:19 PDT, "Manning, Sid" wrote:
> Of course I needed an excuse to ask the question, surprised or curious
> either would have sufficed. So the implementation of a GNU/Posix stack
> over windows is expensive and that is understandable (I suffer from cross
> platform headaches all
On 20 Oct 2008 11:53:19 PDT, "Manning, Sid" wrote:
> Of course I needed an excuse to ask the question, surprised or curious
> either would have sufficed. So the implementation of a GNU/Posix stack
> over windows is expensive and that is understandable (I suffer from cross
> platform headaches all
On 20 Oct 2008 11:53:19 PDT, "Manning, Sid" wrote:
> Of course I needed an excuse to ask the question, surprised or curious
> either would have sufficed. So the implementation of a GNU/Posix stack
> over windows is expensive and that is understandable (I suffer from cross
> platform headaches all
On 20 Oct 2008 11:53:19 PDT, "Manning, Sid" wrote:
> Of course I needed an excuse to ask the question, surprised or curious
> either would have sufficed. So the implementation of a GNU/Posix stack
> over windows is expensive and that is understandable (I suffer from cross
> platform headaches all
Version 1.4.20-1 of lighttpd has been uploaded.
lighttpd is a fast, secure and flexible webserver.
Releases 1.4.19 and 1.4.20 do fix some security bugs.
More details on the official homepage:
http://www.lighttpd.net/2008/9/30/1-4-20-Otherwise-the-terrorists-win
http://www.lighttpd.net/2008/3/10/1
Version 2.0.9-1 of nano has been uploaded.
nano is a text editor designed as a clone of pico, but rewritten
from scratch to be faster and smaller while having greater functionality.
You can find information about new features here:
http://www.nano-editor.org/dist/v2.0/NEWS
If you have questions
hi Guys,
i am facing a problem building mod_perl2 on cygwin. I have build apache2.2 on
cygwin which is working properly and also installed Bundle::Apache from Cpan.
The make command stuck at ld: cannot find -lldap and in the starting it says (
probably harmless ) cannot find -lldap. By buildin
On Oct 23 17:52, Dave Korn wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote on 23 October 2008 17:21:
> > Attempt to execute non-executable address 00419d97
> >
> > Huh? Why should this address (this application function) be
> > "non-executable", while it's executable when TS is not installed?
>
> DEP? AS
Freddy Jensen wrote on 23 October 2008 18:00:
> I forgot to mention that for us, it happens on a 64-bit version
> of Win Serv 2008. We have not tried it on a 32-bit version.
I believe that would suggest this is a side-effect of DEP being opt-out by
default on win64 and opt-in by default on win
Corinna Vinschen wrote on 23 October 2008 17:21:
>> Only thing I can think of is "Not if %ss has been mucked around with it
>> isn't".
>
> Yeah, I heard about that. But what is %ss doing in Windows
Same as usual. Pointing to the stack segment. It just /happens/ that the
SS is a full 32-b
Mark J. Reed wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:34 AM, ProblematicRoutes wrote:
>> $ pwd
>> //sbs01/students_home$/csmith
>>
>
>> This $ sign causes problems everywhere - with latex, with svn, with
>> anything
>> that uses ~ to refer to my home directory, because it expands to ...$/...
>> and
On Oct 23 16:40, Dave Korn wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote on 23 October 2008 15:09:
> > I seem to have missed the point here. The point is, this `push %ebp'
> > instruction is the one crashing, producing a segmentation violation.
>
> What's the underlying windows exception (i.e. before cygwin
Corinna Vinschen wrote on 23 October 2008 15:09:
>> The crashes don't occur in Cygwin, but in the application code. As I
>> said, one of the crashing apps is bash. I created a full debug bash
>> version and a special debug version of GDB which, for some reason, runs
>> fine, in contrast to the n
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:34 AM, ProblematicRoutes wrote:
> $ pwd
> //sbs01/students_home$/csmith
>
> This $ sign causes problems everywhere - with latex, with svn, with anything
> that uses ~ to refer to my home directory, because it expands to ...$/...
> and bash tries to parse the $/ as a vari
Would this work?
cd /home
ln -s $HOME/csmith
cd csmith
export HOME=`pwd`
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of ProblematicRoutes
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 9:34 AM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: A $ in my path...
>
>
> Hello
Hello all,
I have just had my work system set upto use cygwin. Unfortunately, my home
directory and all other directories which are mapped to network stores and
properly backed up have a $ sign in their path:
$ pwd
//sbs01/students_home$/csmith
This $ sign causes problems everywhere - with late
On Oct 23 15:54, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 20 14:42, Freddy Jensen wrote:
> >
> > Apparently the cygwin bash crash on Win Serv 2008 is related to the
> > "Terminal Services" on Windows. It looks like the problem is not
> > there if the Terminal Services has not been installed/started.
>
>
On Oct 20 14:42, Freddy Jensen wrote:
>
> Apparently the cygwin bash crash on Win Serv 2008 is related to the
> "Terminal Services" on Windows. It looks like the problem is not
> there if the Terminal Services has not been installed/started.
I can confirm this observation. It doesn't matter if t
On Oct 22 22:42, Sybille Ebert wrote:
> I have created and installed my own test service. For this purpose, I've
> used Java Service Wrapper, which is from OS perspective just a pure
> 32-bit console program like cygrunsrv. And it works flawlessly, there's
> no delay at logoff :-/
>
> It only has
32 matches
Mail list logo
